My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4704 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARBOR LN
>
4704
>
4704 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 3:06:50 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 10:23:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARBOR LN
Street Number
4704
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
460
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Temporary Shoring: if this is needed, there must be a submittal by the contractor <br />for review. JA recommends that an access plan be submitted for review. <br />• Soldier Pile Grout: I have no problem with the strength of the concrete or CDF, <br />but there is NO discussion of time before excavation. Lean concrete takes time to <br />achieve its strength and there should be a restriction on when the face of the piles <br />can be excavated. <br />• Shop Drawings: the designer refers to an ARCHITECT.... Is there an architect <br />on this project, if so WHO? The real question is who is the project manager of <br />this project and who is answerable if the plans are not being followed. Is it the <br />owner and are they knowledgeable enough to control the contractor's operations. <br />I think the City should require one person be designated at the project manager. <br />• Lagging: the 2 inch clean crushed rock needs to be specified with a WSDOT <br />material so everyone knows what is being used. <br />Sheet 52.1 <br />• More detail is needed on the Wall Plan that contours the backfill into the existing <br />ground at both the north and south ends. Water coming around the ends must be <br />controlled properly so erosion does not take place at the ends. A surface water <br />runoff plan is needed. <br />Sheet SM <br />• The low permeability material must be specified by a WSDOT material. <br />• The removal of material in the front must be designed as to the amount and a plan <br />of how and where it is to be removed, <br />General Comments <br />• These are structural drawings and for that they are adequate if my comments <br />above are incorporated; however, there are NO civil drawings concerning <br />earthwork. The areas not discussed or described are: <br />o the ends of the wall and how they are to be stabilized from erosion; <br />o the adjacent and damaged properties below. Are these properties just <br />being Icft as they are? <br />• Where is the planting plan being presented? <br />• Who is designing the stonnwater collection and piping? That is typically NOT <br />left to the geotechnical engineering firm but done by a civil firm. <br />• Repairing the hillside below the area where the wall is located is as critical as the <br />top. They should be permitted at the same time and the wo ust be tied <br />together and enforced by the City. <br />ViAS <br />Closure 1C <br />If after reviewing this drawing review memo, should you h ve y , do <br />not hesitate to call. <br />Drank W. Pita; PE, LHG, F. ASCE, DGE <br />1109 1" Avenue, Suite 601, $settle, Washington 96101 Phone: (206)666.6200 Fax: (206)66a4201 <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.