My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5021 HARBOR LN 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARBOR LN
>
5021
>
5021 HARBOR LN 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2017 2:23:42 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 10:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARBOR LN
Street Number
5021
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
( <br />4. The inability of the applicant to derive reasonab <br />the result of actions by the applicant in sub <br />boundary line thereby creating the undevelopa� <br />this Ordinance; and <br />5. The proposal mitigates the impacts on the er <br />maximum extent possible. <br />The applicant has provided a geotechnical and �eolo� <br />the proposed design, development and construction oi <br />based his determination on information and recomm <br />making the following findings and conclusions. <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br />There is no other reasonable use or altemative to th <br />upon the envimnmentally sensitive area. The site i: <br />allows for only one single family residence upor <br />feet, which is the least intense "reasonable" lan <br />location on the site of the residence and its bac <br />necessary to provide reasonable economic use c <br />2. Ths p�oposed development does not pose a fhreat t <br />or ol/ o► tha subject lok A detailed evaluation c <br />regarding site preparation, structural fill, slope <br />design, earth pressures on walls, run-off, draina <br />as well as driveway design and construction hs <br />Environmental Services, Inc. (GES), PO Box 1C <br />determined that the proposal is feasible s� <br />However, because the project slope is associatc <br />by City staff on October 6, 1995), alteration of <br />37.040.D and 37.080.C. The Environment� <br />established this prohibition because fill on <br />substantially higher probabiiity of erosion an <br />transport downstream and changes in strear <br />changes can result in stream "head-cutting" and ia <br />tum can destabilize these slopes creating potential <br />above. Therefore, the backyard fill extension is lim <br />3. Any alterations permitfed fo the requirement o/ this Ord. <br />to allow for reasonable use o/ the propeRy. There <br />north and south of the subject property on very � <br />yards located adjacent to and at the top of sloF <br />The applicanYs proposal to locate the residentia <br />area would prowde reasonable and similar use <br />property owners in the immediate area. Howeve <br />out beyond into the steep slope area would pro� <br />property not common to the ma�ority of other p <br />proposed reasonable use modification for the � <br />siope. <br />4. The inability o/ the applicant to derive �asonable ecc <br />of actions by fhe applicant in subdividing the propc <br />creating the undevelopable condition aRer the ef/ec <br />existing platted lot created through the formal s� <br />applicanYs purchase of the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.