Laserfiche WebLink
Coodu�am: The bus operations and maintenu►ce faciliry is incompatibk with othet uses <br />p'tmitted in the B-3 zone. Locating the adrttinistrative offices adjacem to the bus opentiont and <br />mnintensnce faciliry would enhance the efficiency ud service provided to CT employas lacated <br />at the Hardeson Road site. The public urved by the CT administrative oflica would not be <br />better served by location in the B-3 zone. <br />(3) Govermnent activfdes and public tacilkiw th�t invdve la�ge vehkks, buik stors�e or <br />proce�ees that are incompatibk wMlh the pe�mitted uxs or atated purpose ot f6e B-3 zooe <br />shall not be located En the &3 mu. <br />Findints; The administrative offices are direcUy associated with the bus opentiora and <br />maintenance facilities, which are not compatible uses in the &3 zone. <br />Conclu�foos: The CT administretive of6ces are direcdy associated with uses that are <br />incompatible witti other permined uses in the &3 wne. <br />(4) Setbacb for governmental or qu�si-eoveromental bulidints end uxs located ouWde the &3 <br />wne shali be determined durlog the �evfew process as neassary b�ed upon the imp�ct t6e <br />W'uPoeed ux or building wW have upon surroundint P�'oP�rtles. <br />Findinp: Most uses in the M-2 zone require a 20 foot front yard setback along arterials, side <br />yard setbacks of 1 foot for each 2 fat of building height, and rear yard setbacks of 10 tat. The <br />CT proposal would have much grwter setbacks that required for other uses in che M-2 zone. <br />The Merrill Creek stream and buffer provide significant setback and screening from Hudeson <br />Road. The steep slope on the western poction of the properry provides a significant setback from <br />properties ro che west. The building would be xtback more than 180 feet from d�e properry to <br />the south. <br />CT may propose consttuction of a day cate site in the future. That building would be required to <br />meet setbacks established in the Zoning Code. <br />Conclusions: The proposed setbacks fot the CT administrative offices are adequate. The <br />building will not impact surtounding properties. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of Special Property Use III M 2-97 <br />for the Community Transit administrative offices to be located outside of the central business disttict. <br />Written by���/7/J%/1� <br />� i <br />Approved by i � ? .� � <br />7 <br />