Laserfiche WebLink
c= <br />Conclu�ions: The bus operations and maintenance facility is incompatible wich other uus <br />permitted in [he B-3 zone. Locacin6 the administra[ive offices adjacent ro the bus operations and <br />maintenacn:e facility would enhance the effir,iency and service provided to CT employees locaced <br />a[ che Hardeson Road site. The public seived by che C'C adminis[racive offices would noc be <br />better served by location in [he B-? zone. <br />�g� Go��rnmmt activides and public facilitles tLat involve large ve6icles, bulk stora�e or <br />processes t6at are incom{wtlEk with t6e permftted uses or stated purpose of t6e B-3 zone <br />shall nat be located in the B-3 zooe. <br />Findings: The administrative offices an: directly associated with the bus operations and <br />maintenance facilities, which are not compatible uses in ch� &3 zone. <br />Conclusiom: 7'he CT administrative oflices are directly associated with uses that att <br />incompatible wi[h other permined uses itt the &3 zone. <br />(4) Setbacks ta �overnmental or quati-gavernmental buildin�s aod usa located outaide the B-3 <br />zone shall be detennined during t6e n�view process aa nece�arY ba�ed upon t6e impact the <br />proposed use or building will have upnn surroundin8 P�'�P�rtles. <br />Findings: Most usas in the M-2 zone r:quire a 20 foot ftont yard setback along arterials, side <br />yard setbacks of I fi>ot for each 2 feet of.` building height, and reat yard setbacks of 10 feet. The <br />CT proposa� would have much greater sstbacks that required for other uses in the M-2 zone. <br />The Merrill Creek stream and buffer ptovide significant utback and screening from Hardeson <br />Road. The steep slope on the westem portion of the property provides a significant setback from <br />properties to the west. The building would be utback more than 180 feet from the property to <br />the south. <br />C1' may propose construction of a day care site in the fucure. That building would be required to <br />meet setbacks estabiished in the Zoning Code. <br />Conelucioas: The proposed setbacks for the CT administrative offices are adequace. The <br />building will not impac[ sunounding pr��penies. <br />STAFF RECOMMEND4TION: The staff recommends apptoval of Special Propercy Use III M 2-97 <br />for the Communiry Transit administra[ive o�ces to be located outside of the central business district. <br />Writtenby�� � /7/1%i1J�"�/n <br />Approved by -�`J� � rL'� ��—''��J <br />�� <br />7 <br />