Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />,� <br />� <br />GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY <br />Trace und Associales <br />July 79, 2005 <br />Laboratory Testing <br />E-11880 <br />Page 5 <br />Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil sampies to verify or modify the <br />� field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering <br />characteristics of the soil encounterecl. Visual field classifications were supplemented <br />� by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were <br />performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific <br />samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit <br />� logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that <br />these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. <br />� Our geotechnical engineering recommendations are based on our interpretation of these <br />test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgment. ECI cannot be <br />responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. <br />� <br />� <br />In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil <br />samples for this project will be discarded after a period of 15 days following <br />completion of this report, unless we are othenvise directed in writing. <br />� <br />General <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />W <br />� <br />DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Based on the res��lts of our study, in our opinion, development of the site with the <br />proposed retail c'evelopment is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. <br />However, the suk�ject sice is underlain by up to 14.5 feet of existing fill that may not be <br />suitable for direct ����port of the buildings in its present condition. As such, in our <br />opinion, support for the proposed buildings should be provided using conventional <br />spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on a minimum of 2 feet of <br />structural fill. <br />Ht our test pit locations we encountered focalized zones in the fill that contained <br />varying amounts of organic debris. If soils containing more than approximately 5 <br />percent organic debris are encountered at the construction subgrade elevation, they <br />should be overexcavated and replaced with granular structural fill. <br />Earlh Consulianls, Inc. <br />