7720 HARDESON RD BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� r Plan �heck No. 11�1 I:en Callahan, Building Official October 1, 1981 Pa9e Two � Also, since the panels span to isolated footin9s, deep beam action should be taken into account. 7his may require the t��+o "5 bars at the bottom of the pe.nels �•+hich were apparently left out. 2, The closure join111eb�11sednforeexpansioo �nodreinfor'cenentrshouldspass or for continuity. �ara11e1 to the o-iall by the use through unless arranned to allo� moveineasel or �•n'ePP��g do not allow move- of a sleeve or si;�ilar device ( a�, 9� uires r�ent). If these walls are not shear �•ialls, Section 231e�h11tended for structural separation firom the oCher ��ialls. If they �ovide con- continuity, the joints are subject to the sa!�e shrinkage and temperature forces as is the i�est of the eiall (Section 2614(e)) and must p' asnshown,�allrofsthe iiorizontal reinforcement�must o�erlap Pufficientlyned to transfer the stresses or all must be �•�elded together properly. �ecial inspector from Hong Consulting 3, lJith respect to the ��+elding, the s{ Eng�neers is co�'�"�ualifiedsengineer�for�theheeldiag sho ldrhave beenrs. "procedure" by a q established prior to welding and certified e:elders should have been used. ' Chapter 26-5, U[iC SCandards. Since the welding has already been accor.iplished, I�vould sug9est that you require a qualified en9ineer (ldAQO has a list of them) to inspect ��hrocedure" has been done, to review the inspector reports and to establish a P to correct or to redo the �aork. „ is provided by purlin struts 4. The engineer in his letter of 8/12/81 asserts that chord reinforcemen is unimportant because the Level 1 building back to the retaining �•iall system on grid 7•�� If by that he means the ledger is transferrin9 chord forces, he should justify it for continuity ifdnotteelded coraectlye should beArepaired,co�rotheremethod� f resisting� chord forces proposed. 5. The justification for use of do�•iels embedded 4" into the panels around eihich epoxy grout is used to replace the missed do�vels centers around the use of a document by L. D. Noble, which tesieaceld,andequal�ifiedrtohdontheear plants. Assuming that this person is exp ustif i��hat will be done testin9, I have some reservations on its use to J y aced much on this job. 'AyP-2 concrete �•�as used in the tests -��ihat composition and stren9th did it have? The 9rooves on the reinforcing bars sp farther apart that the t1�outdandnrods correctly> especially��'n�as�10P110 tal be needed to place the g' � fiole. L � _.