2410 HARRISON AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

G b. Conclusions: The granting of the variance would not provide t e subiect property with additional rights not enjoyed by other properties in the area. Criterion No. 4: hat a variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights described in Criterion 23. a. Findings: See Criteria #3. b. Conclusions: See Criteria #3 Criterion No. 5: Tfie granting o the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. a. Findin : The Everett General Plan designates this Property as 1.3 Single Family Detached. b. Conclusions: The proposed use of the subject property for rest entia purposes is consistent with the Everett General Plan. Criterion No. 6: 71-e—n-e-e-d-To-r-Ulie requested variance is not the result of a self-created hardship. a. Find in The applicant states that the property is not able to con oim to current requirements due to the I-5 right-of- way creating reduced depth to the existing lots and is not the result of a self created hardship. b. Conclusions: There are unique circumstances related to the su sect property that were created as a result of the I-5 corridor. Due to its triangular shape it is not possible to create a reasonable building site while meeting the standard setback requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Adjustment of the City of Everett does hereby order that a variance be GRANTED to allow for a seven foot setback from the rear property line with the following conditions: • Obtain building permits, public works permits, and provide two on - site parking spaces. The action of the Board of Adjustment in GRANTING a variance shall be final and conclusive, unless within twenty-one (21) days from the date of issuance and signing of this order by the Chairman of the Board, an aggrieved person or persons obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for Snohomish County for the purpose of review of the action taken.