Laserfiche WebLink
Yahoo! Mail X Page I of 2 <br />W 40M A t L Print - Close Window <br />From: <br />Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:40:10 EST W <br />Subject: Fwd: PEMC <br />To: - - <br />Forwarded Message <br />From: "Drew Nielsen" <dnielsen@seanet.com> <br />To: <br />CC: "Mary Jane Anderson" <ken.mj@gte.net> <br />Subject: PEMC <br />Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:56:08 -0800 <br />HTML Attachment <br />Jeanne and Bob, <br />Mary Jane Anderson forwarded your question to me. There has never been any agreement between the <br />Hospital and the Neighborhood, or between the Hospital and anyone else, to refrain from developing west of <br />Colby. In fact, in 2000 (if memory serves), the Hospital announced that it would seek a change in the <br />Comprehensive Plan to build the new birthing center on the park site. They released a site plan and elevation <br />drawings, then, shortly before the June 30 deadline, announced that they had decided instead to build it at the <br />Pacific campus which was already appropriately zoned. (This was, of course, at a time when they still planned <br />on operating a two -campus facility.) After the Hospital decided to place that facility at the Pacific campus, it sold <br />the two parcels it owned on the 1200 block between Colby and Hoyt, one of which was adjacent to the Hospital's <br />property on the Hoyt side, and another in the middle of the block on the Colby side. <br />Here is the history in a nutshell of the Hospital's decision to expand to the east, according to the best of my <br />recollection. <br />In 1983, the Hospital had a parking lot on the 1300 block between Wetmore and Rockefeller. It was <br />planning the expansion that exists today. The Hospital applied to use its vacant property at 13th and Colby for <br />temporary parking until the new parking garage was completed, on the grounds that otherwise the loss of its <br />parking lot on the 1300 block of Wetmore would impact the neighborhood. A group of neighbors, fearing that the <br />use would not really be temporary but would be followed by a request to allow permanent use of the site, <br />organized in opposition. These were primarily people living on the affected block, plus property owners fronting <br />Colby on the east and 13th on the south, and a few others, including me. We lost before the hearing examiner <br />in all respects except that he took the Hospital at its word that the use was to be temporary and conditioned <br />the parking lot on the Hospital's fumishing a bond that would insure that the property would be restored to its <br />prior condition before any subsequent request could be made for permanent use. The neighbors appealed the <br />hearing examiner's decision to City Council, which upheld the hearing examiner 4 to 3. However, the City <br />Council overlooked or ignored the fact that the Hospital had also appealed the condition to extinguish the <br />requirement for the bond, so that condition remained. <br />The Hospital was not willing to furnish the bond, and it withdrew its request to use the site. Judy Baker and Carl <br />Gipson, who both sat on the Hospital's Board of Directors and on City Council, persuaded the other members of <br />the Hospital Board that relations between the Hospital and neighbors were poor, and that the Board should <br />conduct an open process to determine and disclose well in advance what the Hospital's future expansion plans <br />would be_ <br />The Hospital announced that it intended to purchase homes on the 1200 block of Wetmore where it now has a <br />parking lot. Hospital administration also met with City planning staff_ No neighbors were included in the <br />http://us.f417.mail.yahoo.comlynVShowLetter?box=lnbox&MsgId=286_2094977_905_ 11... 1/30/2005 <br />