Laserfiche WebLink
September 12, 1977 <br /> The regular meeting of the Everett Doard of Adjustment was held <br /> at 7 :30 p.m. in the City Ha1l. Council Chambers, City Hall, Everett, <br /> Washington. <br /> Mr. Russell presided; Mr. Black and Mr. Kristiansen were present; <br /> Mr. Saird and Mr. Berg were absent. <br /> IIecause of the large audience and a number of items on the agenda, <br /> the Chairman suqgested the agenda items be moved around to fit the <br /> largest number of people present. This suggestion was then agreed <br /> to by the Board and the audience. <br /> A hearing was held on the application of Consolidated Dairy Products <br /> Company, 635 Elliot Ave. W. , Seattle, P]A 98119 , for a variance from <br /> Section 19 .90.020, Off-Street Parking, for permission to reduce the <br /> number of parking stalls to fifty (50) rather than the required . <br /> one hundred and eighteen (118) . <br /> LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Block 567, Lots 11-22 inclusive, Plat of Everett <br /> ADDRESS : 2531 Broadway <br /> ZONING: C-1 General Commercial <br /> � Mr. John Collins represented Consolidated Dairy Products and <br /> explained a variance had becn granted before on the same issue but <br /> more than one year had lapsed so he ioas reapplying and reinstating <br /> his _�osition. Dir. Collins also mentioned his financing for a <br /> restaurant was now available so they could proceed as planned, if <br /> the Board would grant the variance requested. <br /> The minutes of May 3, 1976, concerning Consolidated Dairy Products <br /> were read in order to bring the Board and the audience up to date. <br /> It Fias also reiterated that additional off-street parkinq is avail- <br /> able during the proposed restaurant's maximum hours of usage. <br /> There was no opposition from the audience. <br /> After listening to the testimony and considering all the facts, it <br /> was moved by Mr. Black, seconded by �Sr. Kristiansen, and unanimously <br /> � carried to grant the applicant's request for the following reasons : <br /> 1. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions <br /> applying to the subject property that do not apply <br /> to other properties in the same vicinity or zone, <br /> specifically that additional property for par}:ing is <br /> not availaUle directly adjacent to the building, <br />