518 PECKS DR 2018-01-01 MF Import

January 8, 197q (cont'd) 1. There are exceptional circumstances that apply that do not apply to other properties in the same vicinity. Z. The granting of the variance is necessary for the enjoyment of property rights that are enjoyed by others because setUacks have been relaxed for other dwellings in the area. 3• Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. 4• Granting the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive land use plan. IA hearing was held on the application of Charlotte James, 5915 Highway Place, Everett, for a variance from Section 15. 04. 060 E.C,C, (Zoning Code: General Provisions-Non-Conforminq Uses) for permission to market an office buildinq H�hich is non- conforming in an R-2, Single Family High Density Residence 2one. Said building has been vacant for a pericd in excess of one (1) year. The E1/2 of the N1/2 of Lot 12, Pecks Bay View Tracts, • 518 Peck' s Drive. M�'S• James presented the Bbard with a petition signed by nine of the neighbors giving their approval for the building to be used for an accounting business. �� Mrs. Kenneth Spillman, 517 Pecks Drive, telephoned D1r. Shockey and said she had no objection to the application provided the . potential uses do not create excessive traffic. �� Mrs. James had specified earlier that the buildin in has been used 19 years as an accountinq office ingan gq2estion and that she is askinq that it be used for a similar business. � Mis. James had . nothing more to add to her application. ' After visual observation of +he subject property and considerinq I by1MrheCronin,aandtunanimously Wcarrieddtoy Mr. Ingram, seconded ' request for the follow.ing reasons : 9rant the applicant's I 1. There are eYceptional circumstances that apply to the subject property that do not a 1 properties in the same vicinit PP Y to the other � is of a commercial nature and waslannexedtto the1City, � _2_ _ _ _ • �