616 PECKS DR 2018-01-01 MF Import

t � � A� x - C M � Ht�rn Hx� tC (] oH ;U • �1H �HH Hy� � ' � HG OH ��g Everett School Diatrict G�� c� SPU 5-90 9 y� Page -2- t� NH g� FINDINGS OF FACTS H C]Ct� �� t+ 1. The Applicant requested approval of a Special Property Use Permit for y�'� the construction of an addition to the Madison Flementary Schoal located O� y at 616 Pecke Drive, Everett, Waehington. The new 1'L,500 square foot atructure xill include aiz classrooma, a library, and two reatrooms. 2. Admit[ed at the hearing as exhibit 5 was a reduced copy of the site plan. A copy of the site plan is attached hereto and by this reference is hereby incorporated as part of these findinge. 3. The Madison Elementary School is on a 9.7 acre tract of land that is zoned R-2. The existing land use of the property is a school site. 4. The propertiea to the north, south, eaet, and vest are zoned R-2 and are developeri with residential development. 5. Pursuant to the provisions of the Everett Zoning Cade (EZC) '�1 41.150.D.2(a), public elementary and secondary schools are reviewed pursuant to Special Property Uae Permits. The proposed structure qualifies under the criteria for Community Service Facilities of this ��' sectiou becauae it is located a minimum of 25 feet from adjacent '�' reaidentially zoned properties and ia located on local arterial streets. '_' 6. Special Property Use Permits for schools in residential zones are reviewed pursuant ta the provisione of EZC 41.150.C(1-10). The general '�' evaluation criteria for such a review include: ' ' A. The need of the neighbarhood, diatrict, or City for proposed � special property use. �� B. The adequacy of streets, utilities, and public services required ��f to serve a proposed use. � C. The impact of traffic generated by the propoaed use on the �' surrounding area, pedeatrian circulation, and public safety; and � the ability of the proponent to mitigate such potentlll lmpacts. '� D. The provision of adequate off-street parkin,^„ on-si �� cLrculation, 1�' and site access. � _ E. Compatibility of praposed structures and improvements with surrounding propertiea, including the size, helght, location, setback, and arrangement of all proposed buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to light and shadow impacts o❑ more senaitive laud uses and less intensive zones. F. The number, size, aad location of signs, eapeciall� as they relate to more senaitive land usea. � _ .