903 PECKS DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

CITY � EVERr,TT - BOARD OF ADJUS7 NT ORDER NHEREAS, theretofore, there was filed with the City of Everett Planning Departmer.t on (date) September 10, 1975 an application for a variance of Section No. . 050 of Everett Muni- cipal Code Chapter 19 by (applicant} City of Everett (address) 3002 Wetmore for (specific variance requested) : A variance from Chapter 19 .16 Section . 050 Everett Municipal Code, Yard Requirements, Paragraph A (front yard setbacks) from the required twenty (20) feet to less than twenty (20) feet because of the City' s Peck ' s Drive Improvement Project. on the following described property: 1. F'red Fadeff, etux, 903 Peck' s Drive, Tract 1, Pairview Heights --20 feet to 14 feet. 2. RoBert Estes, etux, 823 Peck' s Drive The east 70 feet of the south 120 feet of Lot 21 Fairview Heights -- 20 feet to 19 feet. 3. Jim Medford, etux, 829 Peck' s Drive, Lot 20 Fairvietv Heights -- 20 feet to 16 feet. 4 . Ray Pomeroy, etux, 925 Peck' s Drive The east 120 feet of Tract 5, Pecks Bayview Tracts except the north 124 feet thereof -- 20 feet to 16 feet. 5. Mary Berlin, 929 Peck' s Drive Lot 20, Block 7 , Beverly Hills Division No. 4 , except the west 70 feet -- 20 feet to 18 feet. Zoning: R-2, Single-Family High-Density Residence Zone AND: WHEREAS, (date) October 6, 1975 was fi::ed as the date of hearing on said application and proper notice having been given as required by law, AND: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said date and the Board of Adjustment, after reviewing all testimony, made the find- ings that: 1. There are exceptional circumstances applying to the subject property that do not apply to other proper- ties in the same vicinity; specifically, because in order for the City to carry out the Peck' s Drive Improvement Project certain front yard setbacks had to be less than the required twenty (20 feet) due to the acquisition of property by the City. 2 . Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 3. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; because a hardship was created to the Peck' s Drive residence when it became necessary to acauire property in order to carry out the street improvement oroject. 4 . The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. NOW, TIiEREFORE, based on the foregoing findings: BE IT ORDERED BY THE CITY OF EVERETT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT that said application be GRANTED; �'� AND: BE IT FINALLY ORDERED that a copy of this written order � be transmitted to the applicant for their information. D ACTION: October 6, 1975 Rei H. Shockey , Secr ary IIoard of Adjustment