Laserfiche WebLink
, \ P . <br /> � 5. ihis is a safe method of installation with no violations of the <br /> code. <br /> Dave Simerand of the Mechanical Contractor's Association stated he did not feel <br /> that Ashwell-Twist's proposal is a substantial deviation from the code and that <br /> the Plechanical Contractor's Association is completely behind Ashwell-Twist's <br /> argument. <br /> Ken Callahan, duildin9 Official , distributed photographs taken at the job site <br /> and stated: <br /> 1 . High-rise apartments and buildings in other jurisdictions have <br /> no bearing on this case today. <br /> 2. Building Officials differ throughout the state in their inter- <br /> pretations; thus He have a ¢oard of Appeals. Also, Bill Carroll <br /> was not aware that this project will have 726 penetrations of <br /> 23 shafts when he talked with Ashwell-Twist. <br /> 3. Using an illustration on the chalkboard, Mr. Callahan expressed his <br /> concerns about inaintaining the integrity of a two-hour wall with <br /> this type of penetration. <br /> �r. Hollister said in his rebuttal that Brian Waugh, the inspector for the City, <br /> had not mentioned any concerns about Ashwell-Twist's plans to install the water <br /> lines in this manner when he met with them at the onset of the project. Mr. <br /> �allahan responded that the architectural plans the Building Department reviewed <br /> did not indicate any penetrations of the exhaust shafts and the department has <br /> never approved mechanical drawings for this project, although a request for these <br /> plans was indicated on the plans originally submitted. <br /> Mr. Callahan expressed the opinion that these open-topped shafts will act as <br /> �hiinneys should there be a fire. <br /> Mr. Hollister stated• that Ash•��ell-Twist understands t4r. Callahan has jurisdiction <br /> for this area and he did not mean to imply othero-iise. Ashwell-Twist wants to <br /> construct a safe building and believes that the figure of 726 penetrations is <br /> misleading. Ne stated that they could possibly sleeve the piping in the shaft <br /> if it was required. He also stated that 1/2" openings in fire-resistive construc- <br /> tion meets code requirements when grouted with approved materials. <br /> 'dalt Cooper, Fire Piarshall , made the statement that he feels a shaft will no <br /> longer meet the two-hour requirements of the code when it is oatched; that this <br /> �onstitutes perforations rather than penetrations. <br /> The members of the Board were i,..ited to ask questions and John Bryant asked <br /> ��hat patching material could be used to insure the integrity of two-hour walls. <br /> 9i11 Hollister said that this has not been discussed between the Quilding Department <br /> 3nd Ashwell-Twist, but that whatever is acceptable to the 6uilding Department would <br /> Se used. hlr. Callahan said that material that will meet the twn-hour requirement <br /> 3nd that is UL approved is acceptable, ho�aever, he knows of no such product. <br /> Spackle or sheet rock mud burns in 15 minutes and he viould not consider these <br /> �roducts acceptable. <br /> -2- <br /> � - <br />