3229 PINE ST 2018-01-02 MF Import

' 2. Any consideration of a'parking variance was denied us when we built in this area which forced us to purchase additional property to meet the code. Mr. .Newland should be treated the same. 3, The existing parking code is very liberal and should at least be enforced equally for all builders. 4. This "proposed" building is already under construction. How does a building permit get issued before Code deficiencies aru resolved? The Board, members of the City staff and the audience then discussed and answered questions for a period of time. After visual. observation of the subject property and considering all the facts and testimony, it was moved by Mr. Black, seconded by Mr. Kristiansen, and unanimously carried to grant the applicant's request. This request is granted with the understanding that temporary parking will. be provided by lease of City property located on the dead end of Bast 33rd St, without permanent improvements, for one (1) year from this date or until the State Highway Department approves the use of the adjacent property for parking. A hearing was held on the application of David O'Connor, 8251 l.0th Avenue, Everett, Washington for a variance from Section 19.14.050, E.C.C. (Zoning Code) Yard Requirements, paragraph A, for permission to construct an attached carport to his residence to within ten (10) feet of the front property line rather than the code requirement- of twenty (20) feet. Legal Description: Lot 53, Cascade Mountain view Address: 8521 loth Ave, Everett, WA Zoning: R-1 Single Family Low -Density Residence Mr. O'Connor made the following statements in his behalf: 1. There is a very definite need for getting his cars off the street. 2. There will be many safety factors for the children once the cars are removed from the street. 3. There will. be an improved appearance to the property. 4. There will also be a much improved means of a fire escape from the upstairs bedrooms with the attached carport. Mr. O'Connor also presented to the Board a petition signed by approximately fifty (50) adjoining neighbors who were in favor of the granting of variance.