My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 NORTON AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
NORTON AVE
>
3301
>
3301 NORTON AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 7:30:31 PM
Creation date
2/24/2017 7:30:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
NORTON AVE
Street Number
3301
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
--, <br /> ,-- l <br /> (` � ': ^ ',: �:,� � t'}� _� <br /> `�- � � L �` 3301 Norton Ave. <br /> i�,_� <br /> nP�t 1� I98� Everett, WA 98201 <br /> ........................._.,..� <br /> April 14, 1981 <br /> ,.�......................... .. <br /> Mr. Lon M1tayberry CITY OF [VERETT <br /> Publi c Works Departn�ent rublic Works DepL <br /> City of Everett <br /> 3200 Cedar <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br /> SUIiJECT: REQUEST FOR WRITTEN CLARIFICATION OF RIGIiT-OF-WAY USE PERI4IT AS <br /> DESCRIBED IiELOId. <br /> t4r. Piayberry: <br /> Per our telephone conversation today, I ain sending you the enclosed copy <br /> of my letter to City Planning of March 5 which specifically describes what <br /> my husband and I wish to do on our property at 3301 tJorton in Everett, <br /> Also enclosed is a copy of the letter I received frem Roberta Goodnow dated <br /> April 1 , 1981 wliich suggests that a right-of-aiay use permit is the best <br /> way for us to achieve this plan. I am not certain I agree eiith that. <br /> I have sane questi�ns. Two years ago when ��e �•+ent to the Public Works Office <br /> then at Roosevelt School �ye �aere told it would cost us for the right-of-�•+ay <br /> use permit, and also that we �aould have to pay to lease any city property <br /> we might use. It was hard to get a clarification. Someone at Public lJorks <br /> (I believe it was f4r. Fullerton) also told me by phone that it �vould cost <br /> us 5250 to apply to purcliase (vacate) this small strip of land, plus another <br /> $500 to have an appraisal done by the city for the application because, <br /> although �ae are an R-1 use in an area of R-1 usage, we are zoned R-3. Even <br /> then, we were told, it was hi9hly unlikely �ae would be allovied to purchase <br /> this land and would not have our j750 refunded. It was discouraging. I <br /> still want a garden in that spot; I still want it fenced. I am willin9 to work <br /> through this with the city as I think our plan is reasonable use of this <br /> small 12' x 46' plot. <br /> What I ask from your office at this time is „ritten clarification of what <br /> this right-of-way use permit will and/or will not exactly do. Is there any <br /> cost for the permit? Roberta says there is not. Is there any other hidden <br /> cost of such a use? Leasing? How much? What base? Please be very specific <br /> in your written answer. I �aant no surprises to surface after I haul brick <br /> and mortar for two months. Also, the permit says it is valid for 60 days. <br /> We �aant to fence and use this city-owned right-of-way for an indefinite period, <br /> not for 60 days. Please clarify in writing. <br /> I can be reached by phone at 259-5543, if absolutely necessary. However, I <br /> would prefer a �aritten response at your earlicst convenience. <br /> Sincerely, � � <br /> ���� �� ��'.:c�=i- �- <br /> Marilyn Ferrier <br /> P.S. t+hile we' re at it. . . please also clarify, in writina, what would be needed <br /> to purchase (vacate�this sa land in view of the state law which says <br /> land should be returned to �ie tax roles if no use is planned. <br /> , Encs. I <br /> � — <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.