Laserfiche WebLink
�. - �_+ . <br /> (f) Tne roof of the adjacent building does not shed water and the roof of <br /> the main building at 3012 Oakes is patched with material not used as roofin� <br /> material commonly� and does not shed water� <br /> (�) Said premises herein referred to show thirty-thr�e percent or more of <br /> damage or deierioration of the supporting member or members and fifty percent of <br /> damage or deterioration of the n�n-supporting� enciosing or outside walls or <br /> covering� <br /> (h� Said build'ing at 3012 Oakes and its adjecent structures have become <br /> so d'ilapidated� decayed� unsafe and insani{ary as to utterly fail to provide ihe <br /> amenities essent'tal to deceni living and is there£ore unfit `or human habitation <br /> and is likely to �ause sickness or disease so a� to w�rk injury to thP health� <br /> rtaral safety and �eneral welfare of its occupan :s� <br /> (i) Said structure is located nn the pro��eriy described in Para�raph 1� <br /> has li�ht� atr and svnitation and heating facil .ties which are inadequate to <br /> protect the health� moral safety and general w�lfare of its occupants who line <br /> therein� <br /> (�) The sheds attached to said building at 3012 Oakes� hereinabove describcd� <br /> are so <+ttached that they may fe.11 and injure members of the public. <br /> 3. <br /> Further� the Building �nspector alleges that he believes that the conditien <br /> of the premises described herein has become so unsafe and dang�rous as to be inimical <br /> to health� moral safety and p�eneral welPare of the people of the C1ty of Everett� <br /> and further� that said buildtng exists in violation of the Fire Prevention Code of <br /> ihe City of Evarett� and is a dangerous building within the defin'ttion of Ordinance <br /> No< 3941a <br /> 4, <br /> ihat the lmprovements located upon the real property described in ParaQraph <br /> 1� above� are assessed in the amount of �1�400,00� tmprovement valueg tha{ the <br /> Building Inspector 1s of the opinion that the probable m�rket value of said <br /> improvements located upon said premises would therefore not exceed �7�000.00 <br /> for the purpose of determining whether said building could be repaired or remodeled� <br /> the Building Inspector alleges that said building and improvements located upon <br /> the property described in Paragraph 1 could not be repaired or remodeled 1n con- <br /> formity with the ordinances and codes of the City of Evereit and the laws of ihe <br /> S{ate of Washin�ton� for a sum less than fifty percent of the value of said <br /> improvements. <br /> 5. <br /> The Building lnspector alleges that the premises described in Para�raph 1� <br /> consistin� of the building and buildings aojacent thereto� should be ordered <br /> vacated� and that� Pollowing the vacation of said premises and ihe removal of <br /> occupants therefrom� ihat said premises should be demolishedo <br /> WHEREFORE� the undersigned Buildin� Inspector prays that the Everett Improve- <br /> ment Board enter an order requ;ring said premises to be demolished in accordancc <br /> with said oruinance. <br /> DNTED at Evereti� W>;hin�ton� this day of November� 1963, <br /> Buildin� Inspector� City of Everett <br /> -��- <br />