My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3400 OAKES AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
OAKES AVE
>
3400
>
3400 OAKES AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2017 1:12:54 AM
Creation date
2/25/2017 1:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
OAKES AVE
Street Number
3400
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thomas N'ord 1818 34�' Sueet • Everett Washin¢ton 98201 • 425-252-8199 <br /> March 30,2004 \ /� <br /> Becky Fauver—Assistant Plann � � � � �V1 � D u � <br /> i <br /> City of Everctt _ <br /> 2930 Wetrnore Ave. #8-A (�IAR � � 2�04 � <br /> Evercn,WA 98201 <br /> RE: 181R 34°Strat C?TPef��F S VERET'C CIT � k <br /> Perm Se iC <br /> Dear Becky Fauver, <br /> I woul�i like to appeai your decision of March 18'", 2004,where you will not let my property be <br /> deemed a duplex iot because it was not 3,000 square feet as the R-3 zoning allows for. <br /> There are 2 multi unit buildings built on the same block with the same lot dimensions as mine"tliat <br /> were built in 1985 and in 2Q01.These lots did not meet the same criteria you arc holding my lot <br /> to,yet you approved the construction of these 4 unit buildings.Both of these lots fell 6.5 square <br /> :eet below the minimum zoning size to build a 4 unit building and they were approved and are <br /> now occupied.The 4 plex at 3406 Oakes in fact shares the south property line on my lot and this <br /> lot was approved in 1985.The 4 plex at 3426 Oakes was approved and wes built in 2001,just 3 <br /> years ago,and that was also below the minimum si�x for what was built. <br /> There seems to be an inconsistency in zoning approvat that has shown a bias ageinst my lot and <br /> has resulted in my inabiliry to sell my property. According to your letter it shows that your <br /> department knew that the property to the south was I 19.87 feet long and you still approved the <br /> conswction of a non-confortning building. <br /> I just want the same conside�ation that was given to my neighbors by your department and be <br /> able to sell my property as a o uplex lot. <br /> Sincerely <br /> !'""�'16i `Z , <br /> c� <br /> Thomas Ford <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.