My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3400 OAKES AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
OAKES AVE
>
3400
>
3400 OAKES AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2017 1:12:54 AM
Creation date
2/25/2017 1:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
OAKES AVE
Street Number
3400
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thomas Ford 1818 34"'Smet • Everett. Washineton 98201 • 425-252-8199 <br /> March 30,2004 <br /> 3y�� �� � <br /> �— �:. ,�zi j� \�� <br /> Becky Fauver—Assistant Plann��� � � ° " D � � <br /> Ciry of Everctt <br /> 2930 Wetrnorc Ave.#8 A fdAR � � 2004 <br /> Everett,WA 98201 � <br /> �: is�s3a"�sc�c C!TY OF EVERETT <br /> Permit Services CIT,erm Se ic� <br /> Dear Becky Fauver, <br /> I would like to appeal your decision of March 18'�,2004, whero you will not let my property be <br /> deemed a duplex lot becaux it was not 3,000 square feet as the R-3 mning allows for. <br /> There arc 2 multi unit buildings built on the same block with the same lot dimensions as mine that <br /> were built in 1985 and in 2001.These lots did not meet the same criteria you arc holding my lot <br /> to,yet you approved the construction of these 4 unit buildings. Both of these lots fell 6.5 squarc <br /> feet below the minimum zoning siu to build a 4 unit building and they were approved and arc <br /> now occupied.The 4 plex at 3406 Oakes in fact shares the south property line on my lot and this <br /> lot was approved in 1985.The 4 plex at 3426 Oakes was approved and was built in 2001,just 3 <br /> years ago,and that was also below the minimum siu for what was built. <br /> There seems to be an inconsistency in zoning approval that has shown a bias against my lot and <br /> has resulted in my inability to sell my property.A�cording to your letter it shows that your <br /> department knew that the property to the south was I 19.87 fat long and you still approved the <br /> constructi�n of a non-confortning building. <br /> I just want the same consideration that was given to my neighbors by your departrnent and be <br /> able to sell my property as a duplex lot. <br /> Sincerely <br /> /�"'�'J'TD�— Z ' . <br /> c/� <br /> Thomas Ford <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.