Laserfiche WebLink
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY <br />Mr. Rick Remsing E-10558 <br />May 5, 2003 Page 2 <br />Subsurface <br />Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating six test pits at the approximate <br />locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A7, for <br />a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A <br />description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a <br />generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. <br />The test pits indicate the site is immediately underlain by a six-inch thick layer of topsoil <br />and rootmass. This soil unit is characterized by its brown to black color and the presence <br />of organic material. This soil layer is not considered suitable for use in support of <br />foundations, slabs -on -grade, or pavements. In addition, it is not suitable for use as a <br />structural fill, nor should it be mixed with material to be used as structural fill. <br />Underlying the topsoil the native soils consist of medium dense silty sand and poorly <br />graded sand with silt underlain by dense silt (Unified Classification SM, SP-SM and MU. <br />The silt layer was encountered in Test Pits TP1, TP-2 and TP-3 at eight to thirteen (13) <br />feet below the ground surface. <br />Groundwater <br />Slight groundwater seepage was encountered in Test Pit TP-3 at thirteen (13) feet and <br />very slight seepage was encountered at tour feet in Test Pit TP-4. <br />The contractor should be made aware that groundwater is not static. There will be <br />fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water <br />runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater <br />in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). <br />Earth Consultants, Inc. <br />