Laserfiche WebLink
DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />lConsulting Engineming Geology <br />July 13, 1990 <br />Pro}act No. 9490 <br />Page 9 <br />pressures. Otherwise, a reduction of passive pressure will be required. <br />Specific reductions in passive pressure could be developed once the downalope <br />geometry and building designs ere known. An appropriate factor of safety <br />rr should be applied to the above base friction value to resist sliding. <br />(I <br />The above values assume the presence of the soils encountered in our <br />explorations, and a free -draining material behind the subgrade wall. These <br />values do not take into account hydrostatic pressures, sloping ground behind <br />the wall, or surcharges due to equipment or adjacent structural loads. These <br />values further assume the use of an effective drain system along the backside <br />of the wall. We suggest the use of a free -draining sand and fine gravel <br />backfill along the backside of the wall to reduce pressures on walls and to <br />reduce potential for moisture problems. We suggest any basement or retaining <br />wall areas utilize the recommendations as shown on the enclosed Subdrain a <br />Backf ill Scheme enclosed. The drainage blanket should extend to within about <br />two (2) feet of finished exterior grade and have a minimum thickness of 12 <br />inches. The remaining two feet should be backfilled with low permeability on - <br />site soils. A perforated drain pipe should be embedded in the drainage <br />blanket along the base of the wall. The pipe should be set such that a <br />positive drainage gradient is established and access to an outlet provided. <br />The use of ADS flexible type drain pipe is not recommended for greater than 4 <br />foot embedment depths or where excavation and replacement type maintenance are <br />not desired. <br />Rockeries <br />Rockeries could be used on site but they should be considered on a case -by - <br />case basis. 'They will not be suitable for all potential cuts on site. <br />Rockeries provide erosion protection for existing stable soil conditions; they <br />are not considered retaining structures. They should not be considered for <br />retaining the existing fill or on the steeper portions of the site. Potential <br />rockery cuts should be reviewed by a geotechnical consultant to determine if <br />the soils at the rockery location are compatible with rockery construction. <br />Constructton of rockeries is an art and should be accomplished by an <br />