My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1908 PACIFIC AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
PACIFIC AVE
>
1908
>
1908 PACIFIC AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2017 6:19:35 AM
Creation date
2/25/2017 6:19:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
PACIFIC AVE
Street Number
1908
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,o File -� -- r <br /> FROM Ron Cameron, Traffic Engineer � <br /> DATE July 21J 1980 <br /> sue�ecr 1908 Paci fic Parking Variance ��.Y or cv��eTT, evcr��Tr wAs��N�TON <br /> The attached letter and sketch shows the Bentec Developments <br /> request for a parking variance at 1908 Pacific. There are <br /> two additional comments in this memo following the earlier <br /> comments to the BOA and made in response to Marc Shend3 <br /> request: <br /> 1. The "South of Pacz .`;.-" neighborhood has had <br /> history of parkin,. � . �i�i±'ms as various sin- <br /> gle family buildi�+'c<. 'r�;.:e been converted to <br /> offices, multiple 3wei�ing residences, etc. <br /> The result has been a substantial deficit <br /> in total area parking spaces compounded by <br /> the CBD growth across Pacific. Parking has <br /> been restricted to permits for residences <br /> only following public hearings, community <br /> involvement, etc. <br /> There is no possible exception for parking <br /> requirements in this neighborhood. Any <br /> variance approved by the City would be ron- <br /> tradictory to policy and action developed by <br /> the Mayor and Council with the neighborhood <br /> through the past three years. There should <br /> be NO parking variances approved in this <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 2. The drawing showing 45 degree with four <br /> angle Etalls and a fifth stall off th.e aisle <br /> is not in conflict with design guidelines <br /> published in the Traffic Engineering Hand- <br /> book and P,ark'na P �ns3p3€s.• it is exactly <br /> equal to the aisle width minimum of 20 feet , <br /> and stall width minimum of 17.5 feet. <br /> Minimum width 90 degree parking is some- <br /> times squeezed to 90 feet from the 42-43' <br /> minimum. The 90 degree proposal should not <br /> be approved . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.