Laserfiche WebLink
Providence HoapitaJ. <br /> SPU 691; Variance 20-91 <br /> P�.ge -10- <br /> 42. The ezpaneion of the parking garage into the required aetback will allasr <br /> additional parking on-ait- and vill reduce on-street parking. The <br /> reductioa of r`e aetback xil.l noc aignificaatly impact viexs a,nd crill <br /> laprove the a�or•qrance of the aite. <br /> 43. With a variance, the Applicant may renovate the existing facility and <br /> provide additional parking. Thie ri�t will grant the propercy the ease <br /> general righta en�oyed by other propertiea in ehe saue area and zone. <br /> 44. The requested variance ie the minimuo needed to allox the sub�ect <br /> property the general righta for development. In order to aeet the <br /> requirementa for access for emergency vehiclee and parking stall <br /> diaension requiremeats, the atructure mus[ eztend 13 feet into the front <br /> yard setback. <br /> 45. The Everett General Plaa has been reviewed. Inrluded in tbe plan is a <br /> policy that r�quires hospital and cllnic structures that are located <br /> adjacent to reaidential uaes to have a miaimum setback establiahed, and, <br /> to provide a buffer in the foro ef landscaping. feacing, berme, etc. <br /> Aleo in the plan are requiresenta that appropriate measures be taken to <br /> reduce noiee and visual impacts upon ad�oioing neighborhood propertiee. <br /> iiith propoaed landecaping betWeen the eidevaal1c and the parking structure <br /> and the creation of addition parking to mitigate the iapact to the <br /> neighborhood, theee policiee of the General Plan are satiafied. <br /> 46. The aetback variance is not a reault of a aelf-created hardship. <br /> 47. The building facade variance request will not be detrimental to the <br /> prnpertq in the area nor to the subject property as a whole. If <br /> granted, it xill allow the property to be developed in a uanner aimilar <br /> to other properties in the area. <br /> 48. The building facnde variance requeat la necessary because the <br /> circumetances relating to the location of the ezieting buildings on-site <br /> and the need for the redesign for the alleviation of circulation <br /> probleme in the area. <br /> 49. The building facade variance eatiafies the General Plan Criteria and ia <br /> coneistent vith the plan. In addition, it !e coneietent with the zoning <br /> deaignation of the aubject property. <br /> 50. The building facade variance is not the result of a aelf-creaced <br /> hardahip. <br /> 51. No adverse testimony rras presented at the public hearing. <br />