42 E MCGILL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

Mr. Jim Zles January 20 , 1984 Page 2 150 feet east of the two lots iri question. No improvement has been done or is contemplated on that stretch of road, regardless of the presence of a house on that pioperty. The road to the west of the property is similarly undeveloped. Indeed, even with the extra 50 faet required of Projects West, the improved road does not connect to any other improved thoroughfare. In essence, Pir. Crawford is forcing my client� to build a 300-foot stretch of superhighway out in the middle of '?owhere. He is forcing them to improve the street in fcont of a piece of property that does not belong to Projects West, which improvement �aill certainly benefit some unknown third party. My clients rightfully question these inordinate requirements. The project manager has offezed to execute an LID covenant to assure logical development in time. This alternative seems much more appropriate than the extensive improvements envisioned by Mr. Crawfocd. I realize that the city engineer has the discretion to order this type of development putsuant to your municipal code, E.M.C. Title 13 , §2(B) . It appears, however, that several less severe options � are open to him pursuant to this same ordinance. Specifically. � it could be found that the existing street improvements will � adequately serve the four houses on the street; appacent.ly, a , good acgument could be made that this is the case. IIy ordinance, Mr. Crawford is given a certain amount of discretion; but any abuse of that powec should be avoided. H � Please contact me at your earliest convenience so that we may � � H r resolve this pcoblem. �' � Very truly yours, . � �-. - � ` l � � C( t!.;!(� �i: �\( ` � `. ANNA M. LAURIE ` � s AML:dr � � � ° cc: Mc. Chuck Monroe o ; Mt. Paul Edminister � "� � E1 �.. . �. � i i,