Laserfiche WebLink
��,, <br /> i,�- <br /> �:�' �Sl. <br /> � <br /> T�� ��G <br /> �� r <br /> Jenuary 30, 1889 <br /> �� � c � � e� � D <br /> JA�1 31 19�`ti <br /> __.._. <br /> ..............._ <br /> CITY OF EVERE � <br /> Anrtfl I,flttcie �,.. ,rks [`r-c:. ��.r or <br /> Attorney at Lew ���" ^ � <br /> Great NorthNest Savings Building everett <br /> Suite 309 �,t. �,« • =+.�se•� <br /> Bremerton, WA 98310 tyCNLTT. WI��N�NGTON ' <br /> y � ��,�.� .o=o, <br /> Re: MeGill Avenue Building Permits � c�,r ������•r <br /> Letter Dated: January 20, 1984 <br /> Dear Ms. Laurie: <br /> Everett City Council granted preliminary approval to the Plat of MeGill Lane <br /> subject to varlous conditions, one of those being that the applicant wa:: to provide <br /> full street imp�ovements on the entire plat frontage on MeGill Avenue. '17i�s c obsd <br /> have required the applicant to provide in exeess of 22 feet of paving p � <br /> gutters and sidewallcs in addition to requisite transition improvements. Due to <br /> subsequent information being provided the City, it was felt to he inappropriate to <br /> require the e?plicant to provide full street improvemen�a�e cu bmguttee asnd <br /> curb, gutter, sidewalk as well es 22 feet of paving. <br /> sidewallc requirements were eliminated provided the applicant ezecuted an LID <br /> covenant for future MeGill Avenue street improvements. <br /> With the exception of your client's frontage, as well as a smell transition area, � <br /> MeGill Avenue is presently improved with npproximately 18 feet of paving• Per � <br /> City Code, the Public Works Department hac the authority to require your elient to . <br /> provide more than 18 feet of paving for purposes of providing adequate inte�im <br /> improvements. However, in this case, the Public Works Department has agreed to <br /> eccept 18 feet of paving. In addition, your client is being requi�ed to provide some F F <br /> transitional improvements (50 feet of paving)• Per EMC 13.68.020(D), the Public � � <br /> Works Department is required to assess these improvements in order to "provide a r F <br /> smooth transition with existing improvements . . . �' F <br /> C �In summary, it is the position of the City that it has been reasonable in its r7 <br /> � <br /> application of the ordinance requirements. Should either you or you j�c�l�nt C nt et � F <br /> pursue any further discussion concerning this mc+tter, p <br /> � Larry Crawford at 259-8811. � ,_ <br /> � :. <br /> Very truly yours, � h <br /> ��� � , <br /> ° ;': <br /> JAMF.S D. ILES = <br /> Assistant City Attorney �,y „ <br /> cc: Larry Crawford � ' <br /> � : <br /> . � <br /> �_ <br /> � <br />