52 E MCGILL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

Mr. Jim Iles January Z0, 1984 Page 2 150 feet east of the two lots in question. No improvement has been done or is contemplated on that stretch of road, regardless of the presence of a house on that property. The road to the west of the property is similarly unceveloped. Indeed, even with the extra SO feet required of Projects West, the improved road does not connect to any other improved thoroughfatc. In essence, Ptr. Crawford is forcing my clients to build a 300-foot stretch of superhighway out in the middle of nowhere. He is forcin9 them to improve the stceet in fcont of a piece of property that ��es not belong to Projects West, whict� improvement will certair�ly benefit some unknown third party. Pfy clients rightfully question these inordinate cequirements. The project manager has offeted to execute an LID covenant to assure le�`cai development in time. This altetnative seems much mrre appropriate than the extensive improvements envisioned by Mr. Ccawford. i cealize that the city engineer has the discretion to order this type of development pursuant tc your municipal code, E.M.C. Title 1? � §2(g) • It aopears, however� that several less severe options are open to him pursuant to this same ordinance. Specifically, � it could be iound that the existin�� street improvements will � adequately serve the four houses on the street; apoarently� a � good atgument could be made that this is the case. By ordinance, Mc. Crawford is given a certain amount of discretion; but any abuse of that power should be avoided. Please contact me at your earliest convenience so that we may H � resolve this problem. y � � � � � Very truly yours, . � � ,�� �r �: :.r� /; ,,,«: ..; � �: ANNA M. LAURIE � " � AML:dr � � � r- H F cc: M[. Chuck Monroe � ° Mr. Paul Ed�ainister � �- '� :: � C: � . � � ; � (�- � , u 'r �