Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> SC� <br /> p�x At this point Gerry wanted assurance that liis yard would be <br /> restored to a similar state after the support beams were gone . <br /> >y� There was no discussion of liabi p ty for work on the states <br /> � �3 There was no discussion of ownershi of .:�e wall . Gerry <br /> K � he had to discuss this with his wife but it sounded okay to <br /> y� t�im. Getry did call back a short time later that evening and <br /> � H� gave approval to the plan. He asked me to provide a �acitten <br /> y y r copy of what had been agreed to in our pre-construction <br /> z� <br /> con£etence; temporary beams on the Ervine ptoperty, uptighting <br /> � y o and/or stabilizing the wall, and returniny the Ervine property <br /> to its formec state upon completion. i drafted this document <br /> � �g and forwarded it to Gerry at his work address on the following <br /> Hy � day. <br /> zy <br /> � H y Excavation began on Monday, July 9 , 1990 and on July 11, 1990 I <br /> gw� called Gerry to inform him that there we�e only about 2 inches <br /> � d y of footings found on the wall bottom. The contractor was �nsuce <br /> that the wall could be uprighted and I asked Gerry what he <br /> � �N wanted to do. Discnssion of ownership ensued and Gerry <br /> y o y indicated he had seen documents which would place the wall on <br /> our property. I asked when he had seen these and his reply was <br /> ^a week or so ago. " I indicated that I wished he woulo hthe <br /> docomentsls As ofrJuly 23ed1990rIahave ot received th mPY f <br /> T'ne City Building Department has held up activity pending <br /> '�„ � determination of Wall ownershin. A su[vey ha:Webeeilsclh�ed�uleo <br /> �1 f.or July 23 , 1990 . R^g�3rd .�sa ot own_rship, <br /> coecect the situation . <br /> ("" � Sincecely, <br /> � � <br /> �, L DAVIS a <br /> r <br /> � '`�� cc: Tim Tyle[ �/ <br /> Building DepaCtment <br /> p{�I cv:bc <br /> ��i"'i <br /> : <br />