6600 MERRILL CREEK PKY BLDG A SHELL 2016-01-01 MF Import

�UG-11-1?9? 12��7 �.95 � REMCO JN 89281 Juiy 26, 199� Pag�4 TEST PIT 9 � +D� fh, fi�t W ` � ' : :: ,iSoilDescriPtton '? ' , 0-1.0 Gra -brown sil , rava�l SAND, wet, medium-dense Fill 1.0-2.0 Red-brown, silty, gravelly SANO, very moist, medium•dense eathered Ghelal 71N 2.0-4.0 Gra , sil , ravell SAND. dense to very dense Glaciai Til�) i TEST PIT 10 �.,� ' .DB `ttt`fee'# ;; F �:;Soil.Das'c'riP�on" ` .., *�w:. "�t� 0-1.0 Dark brown,.silty sand TOPSOIL, with abundant roots, loose 1.Q-2.5 Gra , sil , ravel SAND, ve dense Glscia/ TiH The final logs represent our interpretations of the field fogs. The stratification lines on the logs represent �he approximate boundafies between soil types at the exploration locations. The actuai transitlon belween soil rypes may be gradual, and subsuAace cor,ditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information on,y a; the locations tes:ed. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indieated on the test pit logs are inlerpretive descriptions based on the cond:tions observed during excavation. The compacdon of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backliil �vill need to be removed and replaced with structural fill during construction. Groundwater No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. The test pits were left open ier anly a 3hort time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the togs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indlcate the static grourdwater level. It shouid be noted that g�oundwater leveis vary seasonal!y with rainfsli and otner factors. �Ne a�ticipate that groundwaler could be found pockets witi�in the tifl and Celween lhe near-surface weathered soil and the underlying denser glacial till. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATlON$ GENERAL Based on our explorations ol the subject 5ite, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasiBfe fram a geotechnical eng�neering standpoint. As noted in cu� original report, the proposed s!rvctures may be suppoRed on convenlional foundations bearing direct{y on the medium-dense to des gn c ate a presenteds nliou�p evious eaport re sl II aopl Icabt�e to lhe proposed devz optment.�he The soulheastem artd western side of the site is currently covered with a thin �ayer of fill and overlying old topso��. Some overexcavation will he necessary to expose competent, native soils GEO'fECMCONSUI,TANTS, INC.