My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1318 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1318
>
1318 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2017 1:06:31 AM
Creation date
2/26/2017 2:52:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1318
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Wrought Corporation JN 06287 <br />August 11, 2Q06 Page 4 <br />concrete curing process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and <br />bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable <br />conditions, inciuding, but not limited to, moisture problems with floaring systems, excessively moist <br />air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may <br />be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential <br />vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or <br />mechanical, to prevent a buiid up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. <br />Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the <br />recommendations presented ir this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan <br />review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include <br />revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical <br />constraints that become more evident during the review process. <br />We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report <br />should also be provided to any future property owners so lhey will be aware of our findings and <br />recommendations. <br />SEISMIC CONSlDERATIONS <br />In accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building <br />file within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil <br />file). The site soils are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction bec� <br />surface groundwater. <br />CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS <br />Code (IBC), the site soil pro- <br />Profile Type C(Stiff Soil Pro- <br />�use of the absence of near- <br />The proposed structure can be suppoRed on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing <br />on undisturbed, medium-dense or denser, native sand soil. We recommend that continuous and <br />individual spread footings have min�mum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively. Exterior footings <br />should also be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for <br />protection against frost and erosion. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if <br />different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of <br />loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, <br />this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand, or the compacting of the sand with vibratory <br />equipment at the subgrade level. <br />An allowabie bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (ps� is appropriate for footings <br />supported on competent native soil. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressures may be <br />used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is <br />anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on competent native soil, <br />�vill be about 3\4 inch, with differential settlements on the order of 1/2 inch in a distance of 50 feet <br />along a continuous footing with a uniform load. <br />Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and <br />the bearing soil, or by passive earth prPssure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the <br />foundat�on. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively <br />Ievei, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following <br />ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: <br />�.��' <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.