1902 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import

October 27, 2003 Iefl Heilman Develupment Technician City of Everett Project: Adems ]ob Address: 1902 Mukilteo Blvd. Plan Check No: C0310-002 In response to your letter dated Oct. 21, 2003 the following co�rections heve been done. I. The slab in that small arca will be an insulated slab (P. #5). 7'he watls will nlso be 2x6 and insulated. An additianel foundetion detail hes been edded to the detail sheet. (Page #6) 2. The insulation shown on the rypical wall section has revised, per our conversation, and thc note added as well. (Page #6) 3. 2a stud Qa 16" O.C. has been revised to size hes been revised to 2x6 smd Q 16" O.C. All referonces to 2x plates have been revised also to reflect 2x6 plates. (Page N6) 4. '1'he intended pethway is indicated. The others have becn crossed out. (Page !t6) S. Handiails were not called out on the uF per Floor plan. They were noted on the mein Floor plan. They are now noted on both. (Page 114) 6. Point loads are now shown on the fla,��framing plans. (Page 1t3 &#4) 7. The Neader over the man door has been noted. (Page #3) 8. The loading path for these 2 beams is a little clearcr, a post a�d pad have been edded in the crewl space to accommodate the reactions from both beams. (Page NS) Tqe original beam calculations were done at the beginning of the project. Since it has become smaller [ necalculated these beams. TMey have the option of either using one continuous beam or two beams bearing on the 4x6 post. I have also revised the beams to be "Rosboro Big beams". These are a stronger beam, a little eacier to work with and are supposed to be less expensive. 9. The cal! out on the plans has been revised to indicate 5!8" type "x" gwb is required on all wall supporting a living space and thet posts and beams shall be wrapped. (Page q3) 10. A landing is called out on ihe Floor plan. (Page #3) I I. 1 am removing the hot tub from thc plans in an effart to expedite Lhe plan check. 12. The hot tub is gone, but the beam is still in plece. l have added e post neM to the foundation wall for the end of the beam to bear on. (Page H6) 13. The window does not need to be safety glazs now. (Page N6) 14. The elevation has been cortected. (Page k6) I5. This has been corrected. (Page H6) 16. The scale of the ledger detail has been increased. Z Flashing is shown. The flashing covers the ledger. Is there more that you feel needs to be caulked? (Page NS) 17. I have included my loadmg diagiams along with the BeamChec computer printouts of the engineered beams. The original beam calculetions were done at the beginning of the project It has since become smeller so I have recalculated some of the beams. I have also revised the beams to bc "Rosboro Big beams". These are a stronger beam, a little easier to work with and are supposed to be less enpensive. I have hied to leave them the option of the PSL and have included the computer printout for these also. 18. The beam size and roof framing over the Entry is noted on Page N4 19. The truss framing over these areas is called out a little clearer on Page IJ4 Thank you. lf you have any queslions or concems please call me al 425-252-9200. Bryon Geerhart Impression Design