2414 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import

� .�. accommodate off-street parking. There is no garage on this site at present. A single-car garage on the west side of the home uas demolished 10 years ago, and only the foundation remains. b. Conclusion: Granting this variance will allor+ the applicant to provide addltlonal off-street parking in a manner common to other residences in the area. • Criterion 93: That the authorization of such variance wlll not be mate�lally detrimental to the publie welfare or injurious to property in the vicinity or zone in which the property is located. e. Findtng: No comments r+ere received from other Citp departments on•this variance, The applicent has discussed the proposed garage with his nelghbo�s, one of whom will be cooperatiug in the construction of a fence. Moreover, there are some vehicles presently stored in the yard which would be stored inside,the proposed structure, This should enhance th.e appearance of the property. To prevent any potential view blockage, hor+ever, it would be advisable to limit the heSght of the structure. In the course of processing this variance request, !t was discovered that the applicant is operating a contractor�s masonry business out of his home and that he was perking a 1-ton truck and a flatbed trailer on the site. The applicant Was required to obtain a Husiness License from the City as well as Home Occupation Permit No. 135-87 (attached) before proceeding with the Yariance request. One condition of the Home Oceupation Pe�mit requlres the applicant to move the 1-ton truck and flatbed trailer to a location that allows for commercial vehicles, and another condition prohibits the storage of contractor�s building materials on site. The applicant hae complied with these condltiona. The net effect of the Home Occupetion Permlt, together r+ith the eonstruction of the proposed garage, should be a generel improvement of the � appearan�e of the property and neighborhood. b. Conclusion: The variance would not be detrimental to the publle welfare or inJurious to other properties. Criterion i4: That the.granting of sueh variance will not adversely affect the Comprehensive General Plan. a. Fin• d1ng: ThE Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Single Family Residential. b. Conclusion: The varianee Would not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. NOVf, THEREFORE, the Board of Adjustment of the City of Everett does hereby order that the vatianee be GRANTED to allow a three foot side yard setbaek instead of a seven and one-half foot side yard setback be GP�NiED and further require the appllcant to meet the folloWing conai:!a::s. 1. Obtain all necessary Building Permits. 2. The garage must be set back five feet fYom the rear property line or provide a one-hour fire uall. -2-