My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2433 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
2433
>
2433 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 8:17:50 AM
Creation date
2/26/2017 4:06:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
2433
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr, Fullec represented himself and made Lhe statement that 6ecause of an <br />error in figuring the square footage of the buildings, only forty-five <br />, (95) parking spaces were required rather than sixty-eighh (68), Mr. <br />Jamie Johnson, the Building Official, verificd this amount, D1r. Fuller <br />also made the statement that there was othcr of£-street parking availablr. <br />to the rear of his business and that he was allowed to utilize the par!;ing <br />spaces in that area, tiowever, the use oP this parkinq has been by a verbal <br />agreement. <br />Mr. Ted Dahl, who owns the property to the southwest of 2902 Hewitt, was <br />against the qranting of the variance for the following reasons: <br />1. That he hopes to construct a future parkinq lot and did not wish <br />� the customers of 2902 to use his lot. <br />2. That he was required to do some paving and landscaping and felt <br />Mz. Fuller should do the same. <br />3. That he had to buy additional property to provide the parking and <br />felt that bir, Fuller should also do the same. <br />After visually viewing the subject property and considering all the facts <br />and testimony, it was moved by Dir, Russell, seconded by Ntr, Black, and <br />unanimously carried, to grant the variance as the request.meets the require- <br />ments of Section 19.70.060 of the Everett Municipal Code, which states: <br />1. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right of the appel2ant <br />possessed by the owners of other properties in the same <br />vicinity or zone, <br />2. That the authorization of such variance will not be detrimental <br />to the public orelfare or injurious to property in the vicinit;� <br />or zone in which the property is located. <br />3. That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect t}ie <br />comprehensive general plan, <br />0:� motion, the meeting adjourned at 9:45 o,m, <br />� ' � <br />Jamie G. Johnson, Secretary <br />Board of Adjustment <br />�6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.