Laserfiche WebLink
Gcotechnic�l Enginccring Evaluation <br />Mukiltco Boulevard Devclopmcnt <br />EvcrMt, Washington <br />March 31, 2003 <br />NGA �ilc No. 366503 <br />Page 1 I <br />not bc allo�vcd to accumulate in footing trenchcs. All loose or disturbcd soil should be removed from tire <br />foundation excavation prior to placing concrcte. <br />Por foundations constructcd as oudincd abovc, wc rccommend an allowable dcsign bearing pressure of no <br />morc than 2,000 pounds per squarc foot (psn bc uscd for dcsigning footings founded on thc mcdium <br />dcnsc to dense till soils. Thc foundation bcaring soil should be evaluated by a rcpresent�iive of our tirm <br />at thc timc of construction. Wc should be consulted if higher benring pressures are necded. Currcnt <br />Uniforn� Quilding Codc (UBC) guidelincs should be used when considering incrcased allowable bcaring <br />pressurc for short-tenn transitory wmd or scismic loads. Potential foundation settlement using thc <br />rccommended allowable bcnring pressurc is cstimatcd ro be Icss than 1 inch total and I/2 inch diffcrcntial <br />bet�veen adjacent fuotings or across a distance of abaut 40 feet, bascd on our experience with similar <br />resideniial projccts. <br />Latcral londs may bc resisted by friction on the basc of the footing and passivc resistancc against thc <br />subsurfacc portions of tl�c foundation. A cocfficicnt of Giction of 033 tnay bc uscd to calculute thc basc <br />friction and should be npplicd to the vertical dead load only. Passive resistance may be calculated as a <br />triangular equivalcnt Iluid pressurc distribution. An equivalent (luiJ dcnsity of 200 pounds per cubic foot <br />(pcQ should be uscd for passivc resistance design for a Icvcl groimd surface adjacent to the footing. This <br />Ievel surfacc shoidd c�tend horizontally � distancc at Icast thrce times the depth of the footing. Thcsc <br />recommendcd valucs incorporatc safcty fnctors of 1.5 and 2.0 applied to thc estimated ultimatc values for <br />Gictional nnd passivc resislancc, rcspcctivcly. To achicvc this valuc of passivc resistancc, thc foundntions <br />should bc poured "ncnt" against N�c nativc medium dcnsc soils or compactcd fill should bc used as <br />backfill against the footing. \Vc rccommend that the upper 1 foot of s.�il he ncelccted whcn calculating <br />thc passivc resistancc. <br />Retaining N:ills <br />The latcral carth prcssurc acting on rctaining �ealls is dcpcndcnt on thc nature and dcnsity of thc soil <br />bchind tl�c �vall, thc amount of latcral wall movemcnt that can occur as backfill is placed, and thc <br />inclination of thc backiill. \Valls that arc frec to yield at Ieast ono-thousandth of the heiglu of the wall are <br />in an "active" condition. Nalls restrnined from mo�•ement by stiffness or bracing are in an "�t rest" <br />NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOC/ATES, INC. <br />