Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> SHANNON F�WILSON,INC. <br /> I seepage was occasionally observed in this layer or at the contact of this soil and the <br /> underlying 611-like soils. <br /> iThe glacial, till-like soils observed in our acplontions consisted of dense to very dense with <br /> depth, brawn (occasionally light gray), trace of gTavel W grevelly, silty sand and sandy silt, <br /> ( with occasional trace of clay and int�rbedded wet seams of sand. Thesc soils weie underlain <br /> by glacial till, which was denser and dark gray in color. Thin layecs of wet, medium dense <br /> � to dense, silty, sandy gravel were encountered above the Gll-like soils in test pits TP-2 and <br /> TP-4. <br /> IGroundwater was encountered in sevecal explorations. It was generally encountered perched <br /> on top of dense to very densc, relatively impervious till-like soils. As no seepage wes <br /> obscrved on the slope, the groundwater observed is believed to be pe�hed rather than part <br /> of the condnuous groundwater table. These levels and locafions should only be considered <br /> i reasonably accurate at the exploraGon locadons measured and at the time of ineasurement. <br /> Seasonal groundwater fluctuadons are andcipated w occur. For example, during periods of <br /> I heavy iain, the occurrence and quan6ty of perched groundwater would tend to incnease, in <br /> our opinion. It should be noted that glacial till-like soils also wntained seams of rela6vely <br /> pervious wet soils that could yield reladvely significant quandties of watec Isolated seepage <br /> Iwnes were also observed within the fill or weathered native soils, especially around the <br /> wood debris. <br /> I8.0 �NCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> I Based on the results of our explora6ons and studies and our discussions with the design <br /> team, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for deveiopment and construction of the <br /> pmposed facilitics. Our major recommenda6ons az�e summarized below: <br /> I ► Dc,welopment of the upper plateau of the sitc, as shown on Figure 1, should not <br /> create a hazard to the subject property. <br /> ► Development of the site, as shown in Figure 1, will not decrease the stability of <br /> I the slope, in our opinion. Instead, collecting and controlling surFace water <br /> upslope as part of site development and preventing its flow over the slope will <br /> I W-6693-01 <br /> 8 <br />