Laserfiche WebLink
SteHen Jacobson JN 96313 <br /> August 17, 1998 Page 7 <br /> Cantilevered and Tied-Back Soldier File Walls <br /> Cantilevered and tied-back soldier pile shoring systems nave proven tu be an efficient and <br /> economical method for providir:g excavation shoring. T.ed-back walls are typicaily more <br /> economical than cantilevered wall�a where the depth of excavat:on is greater than 15 feet. <br /> Soldier Pile Installation <br /> Soldier pile walls would be constructed prior to commencirg the excavation by setti�ig steel <br /> H-beams in a drilled hole and grouting the space berive�n the beam and the soil with <br /> concrete for the entire height of the drilled hole. We anticipate that the holes could be <br /> drilled without casing, but the contractor should be prepared to case the holes or use ihe <br /> slurry method if caving soil is encountered. Excessive ground loss in the drilled holes must <br /> be avoided to reduce the potential tor settlement on adjacant properties. If water is present <br /> in a hole at the time the soldier pile is poured, concrete must be tremied to tlie bottom of the <br /> hale. <br /> As excavation proceeds downward, the space betweer� the piles should be lagged with <br /> treated timber, and any voids behind the timbers should be filled with pea gravel or a sand <br /> and fly ash slurry. The prompt and careful installation of lagging is important, particularly in <br /> loose or caving soii, to maintain the integrity of the exczvation and provide safer working <br /> conditions. Additionally, care must be taken by the �xcavator to remove no more soil <br /> between the soldier piles than is necessary to install the Iagging. Caving or overexcavation <br /> during lagging placement could result in loss of ground on neighboring properties. <br /> 1. For the excavation depths anticipated and with pile spacings of about 6 feet, <br /> nominal 4-inch lagging can be used. <br /> 2. Timber lagging should be designed for an applied lateral pressure of 30 percent <br /> of the design wall pressure, if the pile spacing is less than three pile diameters. <br /> For larger pile spacings, the lagging sr,ould be designed for 50 percent of the <br /> design load. <br /> if permanenl building walls are to be constructed against the shoring walls, drainage should <br /> be provided by attaching a geotextile drainage composite with a solid plastic backing, <br /> similar to Miradrain 6000, to the face of the lagging, prior to pouring the foundation wall. <br /> These drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drainage <br /> system through weep holes piaced in the foundation walls. <br /> Soldier Pile Wali Design <br /> Temporary cantilevered shoring with a level backslope should be designed for an active soii <br /> pressure equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of 30 pcf. A <br /> surcharge of 15H psf should be added to the active pressure for 1:1 (H:V) slopes above <br /> shoring walls, where it is the height of the slope. Traffic surctiarges can be accounted for <br /> by increasing the effective height of the shoring wall by 2 feet. <br /> Lateral movement of the soldier piles below the excavation level will be resisted by an <br /> allowable passive soil pressure equal to tfiat pressure exerted by a fluid with a density of <br /> ��r,<rrna i co����,�.r:��r�.i�� <br />