Laserfiche WebLink
Sfe/ten Jacobson JN 98313 <br /> Page 3 <br /> August 17, '398 <br /> the existing fill and weathered soils should be inclined at 1:1 (Horizontal: VeRical), and 0.75:1 (H:V) <br /> in the dense glaciai lill. <br /> Due to lhe relatively high bearing capacities recommended in this report, extra care must be <br /> utilized to remove loosaned or disturbed soils from the footing subgrades prior to concrete <br /> placement. The site soils are generally silty and moisture sensitive, therefore, it is important that <br /> the bearing surfaces be protected from disturbance, especially during wet weather. Although no <br /> structural fill should be placed beneath the proposed foundations, the bearing surface should be <br /> protected by a thin layer of lean concrete or a thin layer of wasf�td crushed rock. This reduces the <br /> potential for disturbance of footing subgrades during placement of footing drains and reinforcing. <br /> The silty native soils will not be usable as structural fili in general during the wet season or when <br /> they have high moisture contents. Therefore, it would be advantageous to perform earthwork <br /> during the normaily dry summer and early fall months when the soils will be drier or can be aerated <br /> to lower their moisture content. <br /> Groundwater was not encountered in any of our test pits. However, if significant groundwater is <br /> encountered in the axcavation, a system of underslab drains may be needed to ensure that <br /> sAepage does not come lhrough the base;nent slab. Underslab drainage considerations are <br /> covered more fully in ti�e later section Drainaqe Considerations. <br /> Geotech Consuitants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the <br /> recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan <br /> review would be additional work beyond lhe current scope of work for this study, and it may include <br /> revisions lo our recommendations to accommodale site, development, and geotechnical <br /> constraints that become more evident during the review process. <br /> Conventional Foundations <br /> The p;oposed slructure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing <br /> on u�idisturbed, dense to very dense, native soil. We recommend that continuous and individual <br /> �p�ead footings have minimum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respeclively. They should be bottomed <br /> at least 12 inches below the lowesl adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. The Iocai <br /> building codes should be reviewed to delermine if different footing widths or embedment depths are <br /> required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturb��d soil prior to pouring concrete. <br /> Dependina upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disfurbed soil by <br /> hand. <br /> Because of the relatively high beari�g values recommended in this report, lean concrete could be <br /> used to fill any areas of overexcavation. The lean-mix concrete should be 2t a 1-1/2 sack mix. No <br /> structural fill should be placed beneath the foundations. <br /> An allowable bearing pressure o� 5 700 pounds per square foot (ps� is appropriate for footings <br /> supported on competent native soii A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be <br /> used evhen considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is <br /> anticipated lhat the totai post-construction settlement of foo;ings founded on competent native soil, <br /> will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one-quarter inch in a <br /> distance of 100 feet along a continuous footing. <br /> ��n,rn u rmsi i.r,��rs.tnc <br />