Laserfiche WebLink
buildings would require d�c buildings to becomc one large building sincc Ihc lot is not largc enoueh <br /> to accommodate thme, lhree-story residences. Sinc� the buildings face to���ards Buticr Stre:t, the <br /> cast wall of the residential unit adjaccnt to Gast Marinc View Dri��c must bc enhanced with <br /> additional windows. differcnt siding materials, additianal landscaping. or by other measures. <br /> 3. 7'he arraugement of buildings and opcn spaces as the�� relale to othcr buildings .�nd/or uses <br /> on thc sub,jcct piropert�� and on sm•roundiug propertics. <br /> Pin�: 1'hc singlc-family residcm:cs arc arrang�d to pro��idc adeyuate apcn spacc to the front. <br /> rcar, and sides of each residcntial u»it. r\ minimum of 400 square lect of open sracc is reyuircd <br /> for cacli residential unil per GMC 19.Od0.[3. Appro�imatcly �100 square feet ol' o�ien space ���ill be <br /> pro��idcd to thc back of cach residcntial unit. In addition, thcrc ���ill bc ap��rozimatcly 30 fect o( <br /> opcn spacc het�vecn 13utler SU�cct and the front of cach residcntial unit. <br /> Conclusions: Adcquate opett space will he provided. <br /> -4. Yisual impact to surrounding properties caused U�• parkin� facililies in Ihe proposed <br /> development and ��•hether sncl� imp.icts are Iess than ��ould result from compliance ��•itl� the <br /> devclopmcnt standards aud/or dcsign guidclines proposcd to be modi�ed. <br /> f�indines: Six off-sUcct �rirkine spaccs arc rcquircd. 'I'hc sp�iccs ���ill bc accrssed frum thc :illcy as <br /> rcyuircd hy I:�IC 19. 15.070. �\ fi�'c-liiot �vi�le landsca��cd sn'ip ���ill hc pro�'idcd alone thr north <br /> lot liixx. <br /> Conclusions: Rcyuirc�l landsca�iing ;uound thr �urinuirr u( thr pro�,crt�� nill rrducc visu:d impacts. <br /> 5. Does tl�c proposcd dcsigu mitigatc thc impacts that cuuld bc causcd b}• rclazation of tl�c <br /> standards ���liicli arc proposed to bc modificd? <br /> Pindines: '1'lu frunt t:i4aJcs of thc proposcd singlc-(amill' residcnccs pro�i�r modulati:�n. <br /> �iromincnt covered ��orchcs, and usc of dilTcrcnt siding matcrials. <br /> Conclusiuns: 'I'hc rcducc� scAi:tcks hetwccn thc resi�rntial units do not impact acJjacrnt ��rupertics. <br /> G. If tl�c dc��clopmcut pruposcs �;realcr building I�ci};ht than permittcd b�' thc zonc in ��•1►icl► <br /> lhe properh� is loc:ited, does Ihe increase in building heigltt result in an increase in U►e useable <br /> opcn spacc on thc properh' o�•cr �shal ��ould bc pro�'idcd b�' mecliug lhc dc��clopmcnl <br /> stand:irds antl dcsigu guiddines proposcd lo hc modificd'? <br /> I�indines: The buildings arc huilt tallcr Utan n�iJer. 'I'his t��pically incre.�ses the amounl of open <br /> space. <br /> Conclusion�: "Che buildings are taller ratlier thait ��•idcr ���hich increases thc amuunt of open space. <br /> 7. If tlic de��clopment proposcs grc:ller building licight than ��crmitted b}' tLc zouc iu ���hicli <br /> lhc propert�• is localed, docs lhc iucrcasc in buildiug hcihht impacl lhc vic��•s or pri��act' of <br /> abutliug residcutially zoncd properlics'? <br /> Pindines: Thc subject sitc slopes down �i�om thc allc�� to Gast \larinc Vie��� Drive h�, <br /> approximatcly 20 fccL 'I'hcre :uc vie���s of thr Snohumish Ri��cr and ilte C.iscades to the east from <br /> Butlrr Strcct and nearby residcnccs. 7'he prop��sed resiJcncc next to the :illev, unit C, ���ill Ue at a <br /> highcr ele�•ation and thercfore h:rvc thc greatest impael on ��ie�as. Uuit C ���ill Ue approximately 2G <br /> tect in licieht aho��e thc allc��. Noticc signs havc hccn �ilaced on tl�c suhject sitc. Nu public <br /> ccimmcnls h:n�r hrrn rccci�cd� . <br /> � <br />