Laserfiche WebLink
Field sampliog and anelytical melhodologies employed during this assessment are described in "Site <br /> HisWry RepoR and Work Plan for Environmental Audit, Proposed Northeast View Park, Everett, <br /> , Washington." <br /> The iaitial phase of the 6eld exploration program was conducted at the Site on Deccmber 4 aad 7, l992 <br /> and the follow-up phase wes wmplete�February 2, 1993. A total of 27 soil samples wero collected including <br /> 6 composite samples from hand-auger borings, 18 samples from test pits, end 3 surface samples from the <br /> "sand cap" and Langus Park dredged materials. Sample locetions are a6own in Figure 2. <br /> 5.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> — 'Ibis section discusses the results of the field exploration program . d the analytical resulu. The <br /> analytical results of soil samples collected during t6e field prograro are summarized in Table 1. Complete <br /> laboratory repoAs and data validation memorenda are included in Appendices A and B, respectively. <br /> 5.1 TEST PIT EXCAVATIONS <br /> During the initial phase of the fidd exploraGon program, four test pits (fest Pits 1 through 4) wero <br /> excavated W assess the naturo of coostructlon debris proviously deposited on the nocth paicel of the Site. Test <br /> pit locations are s6own on �gure 2. Test pits wero excavated with a beckhce, first removing the layer of <br /> saady sediment "cepping" the conshuction debris fill. Subsurface soils wero screcned for visual evidence of <br /> — contamination. Soils were also scroened wiW on Orgenic Vapor Meter (OVIvQ for the presence of volatile <br /> , ; orgenic vapocs. 1Wo subsurFacxi soil samples wero collected from each test pit and submitted for analysis of <br /> heavy metals and hydrocerbon identification. Positive 6ydrocarbon identification lead m fuRher quentitetive <br /> _ aoalysis fnr the presence of heavy oil or diesebrange hydrocarbons. <br /> Besed on analytical results fr�m the fint pLase of the field exploration program, an addidonal five test <br /> pits wero ezcavated to asuss the lateral extent of hydrocarbon coatamivaGon around Test Pits 1 and 3. These <br /> test pits wero lebeled IA, 1H, 3A, 3B, and 3C. 1Wo soil samples were collxted fmm each additionel test <br /> pit firc hydrocarbon identification and one samp:;from eac6 additional test pit was submitted for analysis of <br /> vola��le organic compounds. <br /> ConstcucGon debris, observed during the excavatian of the test pits consists mainly of soil, asphalt, wire, <br /> end concrete chunks, some as large as tWo feet in diameter. Additional material observed in individual test <br /> • pits is described in t6e following sections. Positive readings on the OVM were not recorded during the wurse <br /> of the excavations. <br /> 5.1.1 Test 't 1 <br /> �" Test Pit I was Iocated at the noRhem end of the noR6 parcel. Construction debris was encountered <br /> between 1.5 and 7 fcet bgs and was limited to soil, wire, asphelt, and concrete. Stainal soils wero observed <br /> at a depth of approximately 2 foet bgs. <br /> � Petmleum 6ydrocarbons ia the heavy oil range were detected in the sample collected from 2 feet bgs at <br /> ' a concentration of 230 milligrams per kilogrnm or ppm. Petroleum hydrocarbons wero not detectal in the <br /> _ sample wllected from 6 foet bgs. T6e MTCA cleanup level for heavy oil is 200 ppm in residential soil. <br /> Arsenic was detected in the sample collected from a depth of 2 fezt bgs at a concentcation of 27 ppm. The <br /> MTCA cleanup level for acsenic in residential soil is 20 ppm. Based on the analytical results of semples <br /> 5 <br />