1620 W MARINE VIEW DR 2018-01-02 MF Import

111 -37-97 14:1.1 IP:i nF FIIEPETT PLffl TEI. iln:2n6-259�-974:1 N15" POP 26 All utilities serving the site Will be placed undorUf!-wid S',ll stabilizatinll ,viii tuj provided for all areas disturbed during construction. No new above ground utilities will be proposed for the project 27. The subject property is zoned by the City of Everett as Waterfront Commercial (WC). The proposal is consistent with the parking slandc.rds of this zoning designation. According to the Everett Zoning Code, no other zoning requirements must be satisfied with the Shoreline Permit. 28. The City submitted that the proposed project must be divided into separate parcels as part of a permit requirement. 29. The City recommended approval of the proposed Shoreline Permit contingent upon 31 conditions At the public hearing a representative of the Applicant responded to a question from the Hearing Examiner that the Port of Everett had reviewed the conditions as recommended by the City and was in agreement with all conditions with the exception of conditions #4, #23, and #2.6. The Applicant's representative testified that with the exception of three conditions, ell conditions addressed an impact of the project. 30. Condition #4, as recommended by the City, requires that the Department of Fish and Wildlife to identify shading from overwater and floating structures as narrow as 8 feet in width. The Applicant requested that this condition be modified to allow the Applicant to satisfy the regulations of the Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding shading rather than setting a specific City standard. The City agreed with the Applicant. 31. Condition #23, as submitted by the City, requires lh9t detailed drawings in accordance with City Design and Construction Standards be submitted to the Public: Works Depai lment for individual projects that show sile parking layout, landscaping, utilities, storm drainage, temporary construction erosion control, and all required improvements of the required right-of-way These improvements were to be completed and approved before the Occupancy Permits are issued. The Applicant submitted that the City and the Applicant are cooperating in the improvement of Marine View Drive and requested that any improvements not covered by the agreement for the improvements of Marine View Drive be part of the City Design and Construction review process The City indicated that this is acceptable 32. The Applicant submitted that condition 426 was redundant and should be deleted. Upon review, the City agree+ 33. At the public hearing, testimony was received from members of the general public. A summary of the testimony is as follows: