Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> Conclusion: The public use and interest have been served by <br /> providing additional and new single-family dwelling unit within the <br /> City. <br /> 2. Pu61ic health, safety, and general welfare - The proposed project <br /> and design shall promote the public health, safety and general <br /> welfare in accordance wiLh the standards established by the State, <br /> City, and tl�is Ordinance; <br /> Finding: The public health, safety, and general welfare are <br /> addressed through the �ndings, conclusions and conditions of <br /> approval stated in this report. <br /> Conclusion: The public health, safety, and general welfare have <br /> been seived. <br /> 3. Comprehensive Plan - The proposed project and design is <br /> consistent wifh tlie City's Comprehensive Plan policies and land <br /> use map; <br /> Finding: Tlie Everett Comprehensive Plan designates this area as <br /> 1.2 Single Family Detaclied 5-10 dwellings per gross acre. The <br /> applicant;s proposal is single-(amily lots and units with a gross <br /> project density o(approximafely 4 units per acre. <br /> Conclusion: Tlie propcsed sliort subdivision density and uses <br /> proposed are within what is allowed by fhe Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 4. Existing Zoning - Tne proposed project and design shall meet the <br /> requirements of the Everett Zoning Code; <br /> Finding: Tlie existing zoning of this short subdivision is R-1, <br /> Single Family Low Densrty Residential. The R-1 zone requires a <br /> minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet. The proposed lots average <br /> 8,800+- square feet each. <br /> Conclusion: Tlie lots met tlie requireriient of tlie R-1 zone. <br /> 5. Natural Environment - Tlie proposed project and design shall <br /> meet tfie requirements of Environmentally Sensitive Area <br /> Regulations of the Everett Zoning Code and Title 20 of Everett <br /> Municipal Code (Environmental Policies), and the State <br /> Environmental PolicyAct, WAC 197.11; <br /> Findings: The site is a rectangle shaped and is flat and is <br /> vegetated with latvn, evergreen, and deciduous trees. The property <br /> lias a Category IV swale on ihe back property line that required a <br /> 10-foot setback. A SEPA review was not required for this project <br /> since it is below the reryuired threshold. <br /> Conclusion: The design o(the sliort subdivision is consistent with <br /> the natural environment. <br /> IU <br />