Laserfiche WebLink
�. � . <br /> (ieotechnical Engineering Report <br /> � Lowell Short Plat <br /> ]une 2, 1999 <br /> NCA Pile No. 359499 <br /> Page 11 <br /> In5ltrxtiou Areas <br /> We have used ibc United States Departrnent of Agriculturo (U.S.D.A.) soil group classificadon (Figure <br /> III-3.]) as prcsenud in Uie "Storm Water Management Ma��ual for the Puget Sound Sasin" (&:olopy <br /> 1992), to classify t6e soil samples analyzed. Based on our visual evaluetion of ihe soils observe� the <br /> material is classified as s I�atny sand. Hased on this manual, an infi!tration reu of 2.41 iaches per hotv <br /> should be used for the desi�of the in6ltration system,as indicated on Table III-3.1 for soila classified ac <br /> a loatny sand. <br /> Silt was observed to a depth of 4 feet in Test Pit 4, near the plsnned infittration trench in Lot 4. Slight <br /> ground water seepage was ohsErved within this exploration at a depth of 8 feet. Silts whete encouatered, <br /> should be overoxcavated down to the underlying sanda end be teplaced with pea grevel or other 5ee <br /> draining material. The bottom of Lfie trench in Lot 4 should be above a depth of 5 fiet m maintein a 3- <br /> foot seperetion betweea seasonal high weter and the bottom c:'the trench. Infiltrarion should not be used <br /> in the east half of the site due to existing fill and shallow ground water seepage. <br /> The soils in the plwnned infiltraaon area� are ��atiable and eilt leyers may exist whioh Could affect . <br /> infiltrati�n rates and paths. "Ib�e soils at the planned infittration depths were generally sends suitable for <br /> infiltration, however the silt leyers could become close W the infilhatioa trenoh in some eraes. We <br /> recommend that overElows ba installed in the event thei actual infilhxtion rate ie not su$Icirnt due to silt <br /> layers which limit watrs flow. The overflows would be a precaudonary measme. Wo expect that tlroy <br /> could be routed to the nearby wetland. � <br /> Drainage <br /> Footing drain systems should be used aroend the perimeter of the planned buildiqgs due to the observed <br /> subsurface water and tha plenned infiltration systems. The drains should be eonstructed similer to svell <br /> drains as described in the Leterxl Pressurd subsection of this roport. The footing subdrain should be <br /> tighUined to discharge into an appropriate stotm water disposal azw. We ezpeet that they could be routed <br /> to the wetland erea. ' <br /> Appropriste moistwe control should be utilized in slab areas. Measures taken s6ould iuclude providing a <br /> suitable capillary break and vapor bazrier for slabs-on-grade and sloping crawl apaces to drain. Capillary <br /> breeks aod vapor barriers should be used for slabs in eny csse where moisture concrol is important M <br /> outlet drain should be imstalled to allow water that may accumulate in a crawl space to drain from the <br /> NELSON-CDUVRE'TTE &ASSOClATES, lNC. <br /> � <br />