My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006/07/12 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
2006/07/12 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2017 10:26:45 AM
Creation date
2/27/2017 10:25:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/12/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 6 <br /> Table 3. Street Design Criteria and Implementation Summary <br /> Traffic/Parking/Transit/Bike Pedestrian & Adjacent Land Use Implementation Actions <br /> Rucker • Heavy traffic. Gateway Street. • Retail and community friendly. • Construct median and improve <br /> • Four lanes with median. (Ground-floor commercial sidewalks (trees, lights, bulbs) with <br /> • Parallel parking. required.) development as an incentive or as <br /> • Improved sidewalks with unifying LID. <br /> • Potential transit oriented street. trees and lighting. • Adjust bus routes and enhance <br /> • Curb bulbs (sidewalk extensions) amenities at stops as development <br /> at intersections. occurs. <br /> Hoyt • One lane each way. • Primarily (but not necessarily) • Add bulbs, lights, and street trees <br /> • Parallel parking. residential. at intersections with development. <br /> • Designate bike route/lanes. • Pleasant, quieter walking street; • Change angled parking to parallel. <br /> part of Livability Loop. • Designate bike route/lanes. <br /> • Mid-block crosswalk at library. <br /> Colby • One lane each way with angled parking. • Great pedestrian street; mid-block • Improvements have been <br /> • No bike lanes (angle parking). crossings. completed <br /> • Pedestrian-oriented retail <br /> emphasis. <br /> Wetmore • One lane each way. . • Pedestrian-oriented commercial. • Add bulbs and street trees with <br /> • Angled parking. • Mid-block crossings. development. <br /> • Transit-oriented street. • Active sidewalk with trees and <br /> • Existing mid-block crosswalks. I bulbs. <br /> • Parking/circulation streets. • Grand becomes major pedestrian • Sign Grand as a pedestrian route <br /> Rockefeller, <br /> • Back-up bike route on Rockefeller. route to waterfront as per Public to waterfront. <br /> Oakes, ! Access Plan. • Add street trees to improve <br /> Lombard, development setting. <br /> and Grand <br /> W Marine • Heavy traffic/truck route. j • Very narrow sidewalks. • Add street trees where possible to <br /> • Four lanes with on-street parking. • Primarily vehicular traffic-oriented, improve appearance(mostly for <br /> View Drive motorists) <br /> • Consider implications of boundary .CC) <br /> condition. <br /> 84 MAKERS architecture and urban design <br /> 0509 rpl_drah.doc-6/29/0G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.