My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006/07/12 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
2006/07/12 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2017 10:26:45 AM
Creation date
2/27/2017 10:25:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/12/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 6 <br /> c. Maximum Height: Establish maximum building heights as indicated in <br /> Figures 38 and 40. This proposal continues to emphasize the <br /> wedding cake approach, with the ridgetop along Colby having the <br /> tallest buildings. Rather than unlimited heights, the proposal caps <br /> heights at 200 feet. Heights step downward each block toward the <br /> west more gradually than in the current regulations. Buildings up to <br /> 100 feet tall would be allowed under this proposal west of the alley <br /> between Grand Avenue and Rucker Avenue as opposed to the <br /> current 80 feet current height limit. The proposed heights in the <br /> Northeast are substantially lower than existing limits (from as high as <br /> 200 feet down to 80 feet in the existing proposal). The intent here is <br /> to encourage low to mid-rise construction, which is more realistic <br /> economically, and would fit well into the context of the area. <br /> I PROPOSED HEIGHT LIMITS* <br /> EXISTING HEIGHT LIMITS <br /> UnlimIted <br /> 200' 200' 200' 200' <br /> 150' 50' 150' <br /> 100 100' <br /> 100' _ 0 <br /> n' 80' ..IO' Er 80'. OS' 6 ' -Ba' ..�, 80' _ <br /> I' 90' BO' 4.. 65' 6; 65' 65' 6; <br /> 80' <br /> n 6S �.�I ....-s._ •'�`�M a.-sr.-.ry.� 65' <br /> ,t,yrs irinh p a-rip.....„it... <br /> 0 Has ; ewitt Ave. t Ce o......... <br /> _ _ _ �g. <br /> a011 <br /> W <br /> • PROPOSED HEIGHT LIMITS MAY BE INCREASED IF PROJECT MEETS OESIGN INCENTIVES. <br /> IN 200 HEIGHT" ZONE, NO CAP ON POTENTIAL HEIGHT INCREASES. <br /> IN OTHER HEIGHT ZONES, POTENTIAL HEIGHT INCREASE MAY REACH 50% ABOVE PROPOSED LIMITS. . <br /> Figure 38. Cross-section of maximum building heights allowed from west to east along Hewitt Avenue between Everett and Pacific <br /> Avenues. If developments meet special conditions, buildings could be taller. <br /> 54 MAKERS architecture and urban design <br /> 0509 rpt_araft.doc-6/29/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.