My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2030 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ROCKEFELLER AVE
>
2030
>
2030 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2017 12:14:20 PM
Creation date
2/27/2017 12:14:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ROCKEFELLER AVE
Street Number
2030
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ci��Y or i:v�,iii:�r�r - »�n�zD or• ���Jus�rh�LNT <br /> ORDI3P, <br /> S9HGRP•.AS, heretofore, thero �oas filed with the City oP Everett <br /> Planning Depariment on January 14 , 197G an application for a <br /> variance of Section No. . 050 of Everett rlunicipal Code Chapter 19 <br /> by L. AS. Jasper, 2030 Rockefeller, �verett, Washington �or: <br /> oermission to build a car.por.t to witliin one (1) foot of tlie <br /> side property line rather than the required f:i.ve (5) feet. <br /> on the following described property: <br /> Lots 17 and 18 , IIlock 423, Plat of Ever.ett, Division "13" , , <br /> 2030 Rockefeller <br /> Zoning: R-2, Single I'amily IIigh-Dens�ty Residence <br /> A?�D: WIIEREP.S, PeUruary 2 , 1976 �oas fixed as the date of <br /> hearing on said application and proper notice having been given <br /> as required by law. • <br /> AND: WIIEREAS, a public hearing was held on said date and <br /> the board of Adjustment, after reviecaing all testimony, made the <br /> findings t11at: <br /> 1. There ar.e exceptional circumstances applying to the subject <br /> property that do not apply to other properi:ies in thc same <br /> vicinity; specifically, the original garage that was built <br /> at the same time the residence was constructed is too small <br /> for today' s standard size automobi).e. <br /> 2. Gr.anting the variance will not be detrimental to the public <br /> welfare or injurious to other properties in th� vicinity. <br /> 3. The variance is necessary for tlle preservation and enjoyment <br /> of a ,uhstantial. property riglit; specifically, there are other <br /> garages in the vicinity that are closer to the property line <br /> than tlie current ordinance allotos. <br /> 4. Ti�e carport will provide a better utilization of the property. <br /> NON, iIiPREI'Olt;i, l�ased on the foregoing findings: <br /> 13E IT ORD13BLll I3�' TIIL' CI'PY OP BVERL•'TT IIOARD OP' ADJUSTMENT that said <br /> appli.cation Uc GRAN'PI;D: <br /> AND: IIB IT T'INALLY Oi2DP;RED that a copy o`_ t:his written order be <br /> t:ransmitted to the applicani, for their informai:ion. <br /> DATE oF Ac'.rTpN: I'eUruary 2, 1976 <br /> C�� _ ' �-� <br /> �s�����'-_::>�, <br /> RcS.d !I. Shocl;cy, Sccret��`y <br /> Itoard of �djustrucni <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.