Laserfiche WebLink
`''it'di\Oi�,:.:°�'i� ��'':.livC. <br />(UQC, 1997). The UBC requires that the seismicity of thc region be considered in building <br />dcsign by rcquinng that stn�ctures bc designcd for ea�Yhquake ground motions with a 10 percent <br />chancc of being cxceeded in 50 ycars (475-ycar recw-rencc). Accordingly, the UBC indicatcs <br />that the project site is located in Scismic Zonc 3(pcak ground acccleration on rock of <br />approximately 0.3g). Morc recent regional ground motion swdics conducted by thc Unitcd <br />States Gcological Survcy (USGS) indicatc that thc pcak ground acccicration (PGA) for a 475- <br />ycar recurrence in the vicinity of the site for "soft" rock condiiions �vould be approximately <br />0.33g. <br />In addition to scismiciq�, thc UI3C :�Iso rcquires th:ll U1L flSE100$L' O� II1C $11V5Uf�acc soils at thc <br />sitc bc considcrcd in dcvcloping dcsign carthquakc oround motions. Thc soil profilc cocfficicnt <br />(5-factor) is used to represent thc soil conditions at thc sita Bccause thc projcct site is gencrally <br />undcrlain by dcnsc to ��cry dcnsc and hard soiis, which arc anticipatcd to cxtcnd to a dcpth of <br />sc��eral hundred feet, ���c rccommcnd that thc soils at this site be ch:iracterized as a UBC Soil <br />Profilc Ty�C Sp TIIC COITCS�OII(II11�' SCISIIIIC COC��ICICIIIS C� 811(I C, h:i��c ��alucs of 0.33 :md 0.4i, <br />respcctivcly. A scismic zonc factor, Z, of 0.30 is rccommendcd. <br />]0.3 I:artliyu.�kc-induced Gcologic llaz:�rds <br />In gcncral, cailliquakc-induccd gcologic hazards may in�ludc liqucfaction, latcral sprc�ding, <br />slopc inslahilily, and ground surG•�cc fa�ilt rupturc. In our opinion, thc potential for liqucfaction <br />and latcral sprcading is not significant bcc;wsc of thc dcnsc/hard nature of thc on-sitc soils. Thc <br />ground surfacc at the sitc slopcs gently down to thc nonhcast, thereforc, the potenti:d for <br />significant carthyuakc-induccd slopc instability is ulso lo���. In our opinion, thc potential for <br />ground surfacc fault nipturc at thc sitc is low bccausc thc ncarest known fault is in thc northwcst- <br />southcast h'ending Southcrn \1'hidbc� Islan� I�:wlt zonc, loratcd approxim:uelp 5 to o miles <br />southwcst of thc silc. <br />IU.�I I�ooting I�oundalions <br />�'Ve recommcnd that spread footing foundations bc used to support the proposed Administration <br />Building Garagc. Based on our borings, native, vcry densc and hard, glacially-overtidden soil <br />would Uc encountered at thc lowest floor clevations (73.5 to 53.5 (ecp. For footings bearing in <br />the ��ery dense or haid, native soil, we recommend a m.��imum allo���able bearing capacity of 16 <br />kips per squarc foot (ksn; this allu�e:�blc ��aluc corresponds to an ultimate bcaring capocity of 32 <br />ks( in �,I;iri:�l soil. 'I�hc allo��'ablc �:iluc c:m hc incrcascd by one-third to account for �+�ind and <br />:1.1-U��nu.lr�p-0tl.�.p IA�1 <br />�U <br />21-1-0964�1-005 <br />