6031 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

, ��od�� P�":lY Og 1987 BOAAD OF ADJUSTMBNT FINDINGS, CONCLOSIONS AND ORDEA .................................................................... vARIANCE N0. 13-87 CITY OF EVERETT Pub'ic Works Dept. Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning code by: Roy MeCutehen 6031 Roekefeller Evarett, WA 98203 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a varianee from E.M.C. 19.16.050(H) to allow: a 56-square-foot addition built to zero lot line rather than the five foat setback required by Code. 'on the folloxing described property: Lots 15 and 16, Block 1� Langs FSrst Addition to Everett commonly known aes 6031 Roekefeller i ;The Hoard of Adjustment� following a public hearing on sald application held on May 4, 198'/ and further having reviewed all testimony, makes the folloxing Findings, Conclusions and Order: i 'FINDZNGS AND CONCLUSIONS: j1. That there have been exeepti aial or extraordinary circumstanees or conditions applying to the subject property or as to the intended use I thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the sama � vicinity or zone. Finding: In 1962, the Board of Ad�ustment granted a Variance to allow an addition to the original struature Which extended to the south property line abutting Baker St. The addition, which created a utility room and an enclosed stairxay on the south side of the etruoture, created a complex roofline and did not extend the 11i11 leagth of the structure. 1'he Applicant wlshes to square off the atructure with this 56 square foot addltion. Conclusion: The request appears to be reasonable. 2. That sueh variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property rlght of the appellant possessed by Ehe owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Findlna: This structure was built in 1942. Numerous other nonconforming homes of that vintage in the older portions o£ the City have been granted Variances to allox them to renovate and improve the struatures With additions. Conclusion: The Variance xould allow a property right possessed by other similar home ormers. 3• That the authorization of such varianeP will not be materially detrimental to the publie welfare or in�urious to property in the vicinity or zone in whieh the property is located.