6031 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

�� ;� BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FINDINGS� CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER VARIANCE N0. 13-87 ��r�odr��.� h�:"iY U 8198 i cmr oF eveRErr Pur'ic works Dept. Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning code by: fioy MeCutchen 6031 Rockefeller Everett, WA 98203 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from E.M.C. 19.16.050(B) to allow: a 56-square-foot addition built to zero lot line rather than the five foot setback required by Code. 'on tl�e following described property: LoLs 15 and 16, Hlock t, Langs First Addition to Everett i �commonly knoWn as: 6037 8ockefeller I �The Board of Ad�ustment, following a publie hearing on said application held on May 4, 1987 and further having reviexed all testimony� makes the ;folloxing Findings, Conelusions and Order: I FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIOWS: i1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or � conditions applying to the subject property or as to the intended use j thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same � vieinity or zone. t I Finding: In 1962, the Board of Adjustment granted a Variance to allow an addition to the original strueture srhich extended to the south property line abutting Baker St. The addition, whieh created a utility room and an enclosed stairxay on the south side of the atrueture, created a complea roofline and did not extend the full I length of the structure. The Applicant wishes to squ�.re off the etructure with this 56 square foot addition. Conelusion: The request appears to be reasonable. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyuent of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of other propertiey in the same vicinity or zone. Finding: This structure Was built in 1942. Numerous other noneonforming homes of that vintage in the older portions of the City have been granted Varianees to allox them to renovate and improve the struct�res with additions. Conclusion: The Variance would allow a property right possessed by other similar home owners. That the authorization of such variance uill not be materially detrimental to the public aelfare or injurious to property in the vicinity or zone in Which the property is located.