1871 ROSS AVE VERIZON ANTENNA 2016-01-01 MF Import

services once built. The streets, utilities, and public services in the area are adequate for the proposed use. (exhibif 1, Tyler testimony) 12. Tliere would be no adverse traffic impacts generated by the proposal. Minimal tra(fic would be generated for maintenance purposes; other than one or two vehicular trips per month, lhere would be no on-going trips generated. (exhibi( 1) 13. No permanent off-streel parking would be required. Because of the limited use of the site (or vehicies, there is no parking needed other than for the mainteiiance vehicle. There would be parking availabie for mainlenance purpuses. (exhibit 1, Hirsch tesiimony) 14. The Cily indicuted lhat the proposed facility would be �ocated at least one-half mile from any residence. It would be approximalely four feet in diameter and would be 150 feel tall. Upon erection, the flagpole would be able to hoid a large flao of lhe United States, the State of Washington, or othei noncommercial institutions flag. (exhibit 1, Hirsch testimony) 15. The wireless antenna would be concealed within tlie pole. As noted, it could accommodate addilional wireless facilitators. Il wouid be compa!ible wilh the surrounding properties and would not impact sensitive I�i�J uses in the generai area. The proposed use would result in another comm�rciai use on the site. (exhibit 1, Hirsch festimony, Tylertestimony) 16. The pole wout� be the tallest structure in lhe vicinity. It would be visible, especially for vehicles on Inlerslate 5. This would be a fleeting visual impact and vdould not have nearly the impact than it would have on residents. The closest residence is over one-half mile away. (exhibit i, Tyler testimony) 17. Dagmar's Landing is a developed commercial property in which boats are stored. There is existing signage on-sile, and merchandise is displaye�. Much ot the existing signage and inventory on-site would screen ihe proposed equipment building. According to lhe City, because of the location of tfie site and the interior portion of Dagmar's Landing, landscaping around the site enclosure would not be visible from the freeway 2nd would not provide a benefit to abutting property owners. The City is nol recommending any specific landscaping of this facility. No signs are proposed for the projecL (exhibit 1) 18. The proposed facility would be unmanned and would not generate noise, dust, smoke, odor, glare, or other nuisances. ;exhibit 1, Tyler testimony) 19. The subject property is designated in tlie Everett General Comprehensive Plan a� 5.1, Heavy Induslrial. The Comprehensive Plan encourages co-location of u!ililies, as does Federal legislation regulating telephone cell towers. The proposal would be consistent with the Everett General Plan. (exhibit 1, Tyler testirnony) 5� 'i z/