My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2102 ROSS AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ROSS AVE
>
2102
>
2102 ROSS AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2022 8:50:57 AM
Creation date
2/27/2017 2:51:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ROSS AVE
Street Number
2102
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
342
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I_ <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL <br />-----'ONGA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEoLOGISTS <br />Mahn office <br />17311 — 135" Avanue NE, A-500 <br />W00dirIVIUV, WA 98072 <br />(425) 486-1663 FAX (425) 481 :510 <br />(425) 337.16M Snohomish County <br />March 13, 2009 <br />Mr. Rich McClean <br />McClean Iron Works <br />6501 202th St:ect SW <br />Lynnwood, Washington 98036 <br />Construction )Monitoring Sununu)? letter <br />McClean Ironworks <br />2000 Ross Avenue <br />Everett, Washington <br />NGA File No. 790308 <br />Dear Mr. McClean: <br />Engineonrg-Geotogy Branch <br />437 East Penny Road <br />Wonslrhse, WA 98801 <br />(509) 565-7606 FAX (609) 665-7692 <br />This letter sum.-nnrizes our observations during the pin pile installation phase of the project. The site <br />is located at 2000 Ross Avenue in Everett, Washington. We have previously prepared a letter titled <br />"Deep Foundation Support — McClean Iron Works — Everett, WA," dated July 10, 2008 tmd a memo <br />dated August 8, 2008 that. provided mcomrneudations for deep foundation support for the proposed <br />building. <br />We monitored pin -pile installation activities on a par,-drac basis during ale period of May 30, 2008 <br />through February 11, 2009. Our observations were documented in Field Reports 1 through 52 which <br />were submitted to you. <br />Our services began by observing load tests on a 4-inch and 6-iuch pin pile. The piles were driven to a <br />refusal criteria of less than one -inch of pile movement during 20 seconds of continuous driving for the <br />4-inch diameter pile and less than one -inch of pile movement during 30 sceouds of continuous driving <br />for the 6-inch diameter pile. These piles were then successfully load tested to 200 percent of there <br />design capacity which is 11-tons for the 4-inch diameter piles and 22-tons for the 6-inch diameter <br />piles. After the load tests were performed, we ooserved 8 total of 408, 4-inch and 6-inch diameter pin <br />piles driven to refusal to provide support for the building and crane foundations and slab. The pin <br />piles were drivral to refusal using a 2,000 R-lb hydraulic rock breaker. The refusal criterion used was <br />(V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.