My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3003 W CASINO RD 1992 SITE DEV 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
3003
>
SITE DEV
>
3003 W CASINO RD 1992 SITE DEV 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2018 8:42:12 AM
Creation date
3/6/2017 3:23:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
3003
Tenant Name
SITE DEV
Permit
PW 290.360.311
Year
1992
Notes
N PARKING
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ • <br /> ;�� L. <br /> � j� <br /> ! r ' J <br /> / �' �-li <br /> 7��� ' L� �t. <br /> �` � <br /> MEMORANDUM �'�^ V `� <br /> ,�<<� ' P , <br /> �� , <br /> � ' <br /> r.r i � � ,� <br /> '� �`� �,r�^'�� ! <br /> TO: Kirk E3rooks �� � <br /> � � , <br /> FROM: Jane Zimmerman ` �� � , <br /> ., <br /> � <br /> DATE: August 3, 1992 / ' � <br /> SUBJECT: Boeing North Parking Lot Expansion <br /> My comments to Planning on the subject plans are: <br /> �� Fairly extensive grading, adjacent to the parking areas, is <br /> � proposed in the 60 foot wildlife corridor. Is this <br /> acceptable? <br /> It appears that tt�ere is a natural drainage way runninq <br /> along the east side of the parking lot expansion area that <br /> ends np discharging to the existing detention pond located <br /> to the north. In addition to grading for the parking lot <br /> and construction of a storm line to the pond, Boeing is <br /> proposinq a culvert to pick up drainage in this area (see <br /> sheets C152 and C292) . Before the plans are approved, the <br /> ✓ area should be checked to determine that the natural <br /> drainage does not meet the definition of a stream and/or <br /> that wetland areas do not exist alonq the natural drainage <br /> route. if a stream or wetland does exist in this area, the <br /> topography indicates that proposed grading for a portion of <br /> the parkinq lot expansion would probably occur within the <br /> buffer. . . In addition, clearinq for and construction of the <br /> storm line to the existinq pond would be within the buffer <br /> area if the drainage way to the pond is categorized as a <br /> stream or wetland. <br /> other comments are: <br /> jA revegetation plan is required to be approved by Planni+�g <br /> for those areas where disturbance of the wildlife corridor <br /> ' will occur. <br /> The EIS document states that vegetated swales must be <br /> provided to treat stormwater runoff from all. areas except <br /> for those draining to the peat filter system. The majority <br /> � of the north parking lot expansion area naturally discharges <br /> to an existing detention pond located to the north. A <br /> vegetated swale designed per City standards must be provided <br /> - to treat this runoff before it leaves the site or discharges <br /> to a wetland or stream. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.