Laserfiche WebLink
Jenurry 14, 2003 <br />HWA Proiect No. 2002-146-21 <br />for eazthquakc events associated with a 475-year retum period (]0 percent probability of <br />exceedrnce in 50 years). Using these earthquake records, ProShake analyses wae <br />performed several times and a parametric sensitivity study was performed for input <br />variables including modulus reduction and damping relationships. Our analyses were <br />completed assuming a damping level of 5 percent. The mean site-speciSc elastic <br />response spectra is presented on Figure 3. <br />UBC Section l63 L5.4 stipulates that Elastic Response Parameters be reduced such that the <br />corresponding design base shear be no less that 80 percent of the base sheaz detecmined <br />using the static force proceduro (Section 1630.2.1). Because the site-specific elastic <br />response spectrum falls below 80 percent of the static force procedure base shear, the site <br />response must be taken as 80 percent of the static force procedure bue shear. Code-based <br />elutic spectrum corresponding to soil type SE and 80 percent of soil Type SE aze presented <br />on Figure 3. For reference, the code-based elastic spectrum corresponding to soil type Sois <br />also presented in Figure 3. The seismic coefficients C, and C�, which correspond to 80 <br />percent of soi) Type SE response spectrum, are 0.29 and 0.67, respectively. <br />4.3 P[LE FOUNDAT[ONS <br />4.3.1 General <br />Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, it is our opinion that the new <br />maintenance building should be suppoited using piles. Spread foundations aze not <br />considered feasible for the new building, due to the prevalence of compressible soils <br />which could lead to excessive differential settlement, and also due to potentially <br />liquefiable layers in the upper portion of the alluvium. Our evaluations indicate that <br />driven displacement piling is the most practical and cost-effective deep foundation <br />alternative. Use of drilled shafts is not considered feasible, due to: 1) the very loose, <br />saturated deposits which would require casing the entire shaft length during consWction; <br />and 2) the relatively poor bearing characteristics of soils anticipated at shaft tip <br />elevations, which would result in relatively low bearing capacities for drilled shafts. <br />In conjunction with ihe design team, che preferred choice of pile type has been reduced to <br />either timber piles or precast concrete piies for use on the project. <br />Based on our understanding of the previous foundations consiructed at this site, the <br />apparendy saNs`actory performance of those foundations and conversations with the City <br />of Everett and the design team, we recommend founding thc piles at elevation —35 to <br />provide a foundation that wil( perfortn consistent with the other buildings at the site. <br />Parameters for design of deep foundation systems, including allowable axial and lateral <br />load capacities, construction considerations, and geotechnical monitoring requirements <br />are provided below. Settlement of the piles is addressed in Section 4.4. <br />?002 N6 «pon • final <br />HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. <br />